SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Centennial Technologies (CTN)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1959 7 0 CTN
Emcee:  sheldon zoldan Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1334 yeah how omminous are we talking about an upcoming NASDAQ listing? BPFbpf-7/23/1997
1333 Please explain "Here it comes now......"?Firehead-7/23/1997
1332 Here it comes now......PPearse-7/22/1997
1331 Three days ago I called Centennial and left a message asking if they had filed Firehead-7/19/1997
1330 Anyone notice that Centennial has not filed its 10K report??? They had requesteShel10-7/18/1997
1329 For what it's worth, I've had no trouble buying shares via Schwab OnlinPPearse-7/17/1997
1328 I purchased them through my regular broker, how they purchased them I do not knnettie-7/17/1997
1327 Nettie, how do you actually purchase the shares? I am with Fidelity. Do you a sbpf-7/17/1997
1326 Well 1.625 sounds like a better buy than when I thought I was bottom fishing atnettie-7/17/1997
1325 I have been trying to get some through E*Trade but havn't been able to. I Firehead-7/16/1997
1324 Hey, who thinking about buying right now at 1.625? This has got to be the ultimbpf-7/15/1997
1323 Well, it is July 15. Any news you know of?Firehead-7/15/1997
1322 We should be able to know this shortly. Originally, the negotiated settlement PPearse-7/13/1997
1321 The last i heard on this thread (alluding to the Boston Globe), the general teaatkinson-7/12/1997
1320 Yes, the Company did have insurance in place to protect against fraud by employPPearse-7/12/1997
1319 Geez...heavy day of trading today. Looks like we got 'em right where we waSteve W.-7/11/1997
1318 I believe the answer on both counts is yes. My question is whether or not the Terry-7/10/1997
1317 I don't recall anyone posing this question, but if it's already been diDan-7/10/1997
1316 Frank, My understanding is that things get sticky when it comes to a company buD. J.-7/4/1997
1315 OK, here's what I found out: Centennial requested an extension until July PPearse-7/4/1997
1314 Frank, I partially agree. While I take solace in the supposed fact that RamaekPPearse-7/2/1997
1313 STEVE, this is not necessarily bad news. It's beginning to look like we arFrank childers-7/2/1997
1312 Good luck Steve. We better off chasing winners instead of this loser. Who knBehrooz Rezai-7/2/1997
1311 This stock sucks lately! Optimism is a hard thing to foster under such adverse Steve W.-7/2/1997
1310 Mr. PPearse - I read with interest your message (6/30/97). This events you briBehrooz Rezai-6/30/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):