SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
14627 28 0 PMU
Emcee:  James Cook Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13352"Excuse me, but the tough questions you asked PFG were ...?", re-read charred-7/18/2000
13351Its like a Tyson boxing match around here. Watch out for flying ears! Pacific RNatedog-7/18/2000
13350Thanks Qd, Not much more time to wait. Should get interesting pretty soon. BesNexus-7/18/2000
13349Nexus, When I last spoke to Barb Henderson (PFG IR), she indicated the release Quickdraw-7/18/2000
13348Claude, You are right. I did not express my thoughts clearly. I just meant thatNexus-7/18/2000
13347Qd, 51K shares will be meaningless when the action starts on this one, weather Nexus-7/18/2000
13346Nexus, <<Whether an old shareholder holds 5 shares at $1/each or a new shClaude Cormier-7/18/2000
13345Claude, Whether an old shareholder holds 5 shares at $1/each or a new shareholdNexus-7/18/2000
13344<<Foolish statement>>. Foolish remark <g>! << Weather Claude Cormier-7/18/2000
13343Darren, Yesterday you said <<Something is wrong. There is 51K on the ask Quickdraw-7/18/2000
13342<font color=blue>Claude, Colour only shows up on the main thread ...</fQuickdraw-7/18/2000
13341<<Very dangerous attitude. There is no guarantee you will get 150-300m of Nexus-7/18/2000
13340Geeez. Yesterday a block on the ask of 51K at 4.75. Today a block on the bid of DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck-7/18/2000
13339<<I still believe the cap value is discounting a 3 million ounce resource Claude Cormier-7/18/2000
13338<<Actually arrogantly confident. >> Very dangerous attitude. There Claude Cormier-7/18/2000
13337<font color=red>Ah shucks, did I do that? (ggggggggg)</font> WEll Claude Cormier-7/18/2000
13336I agree that this isn't the slam dunk it's promoted as. It appears to meElizabeth Andrews-7/18/2000
13335Charred, Now I understand why you are mixed up about the Luicho situation. Shrahank2010-7/18/2000
13334Excuse me, but the tough questions you asked PFG were ...? QdQuickdraw-7/18/2000
13333Hello Quickdraw, your updates are great but why don't you ask the tough quescharred-7/18/2000
13332Hello Elizabeth, what do you think of the carbonaceous zone? Why mix in all the charred-7/18/2000
13331Hank again you are very wrong. Sampling down a cliff face doesn't mean the charred-7/18/2000
13330Ya, that is true, at least with respect to the altered body parts. Just think whElizabeth Andrews-7/18/2000
13329<<<<I'm flat as you know! >>>> I do not recall discrusset-7/18/2000
13328I think that Russett is suggesting that we all have our hand (s) if you prefer, Elizabeth Andrews-7/17/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News