SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1338Digital cable rollout has been lagging. The major cable players move at a snailThe Ox-8/2/2000
1337"Cable is a good place to be, but it is crowded Do you mean crowded in terMeDroogies-8/2/2000
1336I’m wondering if CNXT’s new chip CN9414, the single-chip programmable cable modegpowell-8/2/2000
1335Thankyou for your views from the field which I am in sharp disagreement with givgreggcap-8/2/2000
1334Wireless is limited NOW...but that's rapidly changing. That's why growtMeDroogies-8/2/2000
1333Wireless at present is a limited market and cable has a huge established reach agreggcap-8/2/2000
1332Wireless is the future. Cable is a good place to be, but it is crowded and growMeDroogies-8/2/2000
1331Looks like CNXT has turned around and we might be heading back to $50 then highegreggcap-8/2/2000
1330This could be pretty big, in the short term. I still think cable is going to beMeDroogies-8/2/2000
1329biz.yahoo.comThai Chung-8/2/2000
1328OK...got me. But given the relative lack of humor in previous posts, you can haMeDroogies-7/31/2000
1327Duh!!!! It was joke, meDroogies. Cue the laugh track.David W. Taylor-7/30/2000
1326I doubt you really earn a penny from this advice. Even so, you have yet to be MeDroogies-7/30/2000
1325>> If you are true to your own strategy you could never invest in a new coDavid W. Taylor-7/30/2000
1324It's nice to know you do look forward. Previously you had insisted that traigpowell-7/30/2000
1323>> BTW I think the fair price for CNXT right now is around $70. >> David W. Taylor-7/30/2000
1322David-your fascination with CNXT's alledged overvalue is misplaced. Your bew molloy-7/29/2000
1321brian h I agree with your assesment of SpinCo valuation. Some analysts are talkw molloy-7/29/2000
1320>> would you adjust your target price up in anticipation of greater earninDavid W. Taylor-7/29/2000
1319WM, I just read some fundamentals about CNXT. Boy. I already feel very good abrian h-7/29/2000
1318<i>With the reductions that you cite, I would have to agree.</i> Itgpowell-7/29/2000
1317OK, I changed my mind.David W. Taylor-7/29/2000
1316A blast from the past... Message 13767381 BAck up the truck indeed. I guess thw molloy-7/29/2000
1315Yes, seriously, you are correct. With the reductions that you cite, I would havDavid W. Taylor-7/28/2000
1314Okay David, since you failed to answer my question, I’ll answer it for you - usigpowell-7/28/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News