Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters"

An SI Board Since December 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2390	1	0

Emcee: rodster397	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1340	I would have said the same thing if it had been in the Washington Times or such	The Philosopher	-	1/7/1999
1339	That'ts another old one the limeballs can't resist garbage whether it	the gator	-	1/7/1999
1338	I would not have given any credence to this story, except that it appears on th	The Philosopher	-	1/7/1999
1337	Rose save your breath as I am doing. We have a 70 some odd billion dollar sur	the gator	-	1/6/1999
1336	OT Late getting back to you but got the urge and went to Tempe to see the ga	the gator	-	1/6/1999
1335	Thanks for the clarification. Amazingly, I think we agree on all except the pe	The Philosopher	-	1/6/1999
1334	Sigh. This is getting repetitive. >>Okay, Rose Rose. Gain some credibil	Rose Rose	-	1/6/1999
1333	Liberals still refuse to acknowledge their historic complicity with fundamental	Zoltan!	-	1/6/1999
1332	<i>[now Chris you know deep down you are really rooting for Clinton	The Philosopher	-	1/6/1999
1331	You'd know about troglodytes, Bill. <i>Be happy to have GOP die if t	Daniel Schuh	-	1/6/1999
1330	You are degenerating into a troglodyte right before our eyes. This conversation	Bill	-	1/6/1999
1329	<< Ergo, you are actually a Newt clone in disguise. (Even your handle has	pezz	-	1/6/1999
1328	How am I changing the subject, Bill? <i>Be happy to have GOP die if tha	Daniel Schuh	-	1/6/1999
1327	Always trying to change the subject when you're intellectually defeated? It	Bill	-	1/6/1999
1326	What definition in the PJ case limited sexual relations to sexual intercourse?	The Philosopher	-	1/6/1999
1325	Yes, you're surely the one to lecture on "reasoned debate", Bill.	Daniel Schuh	-	1/6/1999
1324	Is simple, yes, but not the way you think. Since you are obviously totally c	The Philosopher	-	1/6/1999
1323	The court's definition (for which I provided the URL) was used in the Paula	Peter O'Brien	-	1/6/1999
1322	What? Your series of non sequiturs essentially eliminates you from any reasoned	Bill	-	1/6/1999
1321	Wrong. Court's Definition > SI. Can't you read?	Peter O'Brien	-	1/6/1999
1320	So there isn't such a thing as prosecutorial discretion? Aside from the fa	Daniel Schuh	-	1/6/1999
1319	So the law doesn't apply to civil cases?	Bill	-	1/6/1999
1318	Ewwww, we're getting pretty deep in the muck here, Bill. As far as dense g	Daniel Schuh	-	1/6/1999
1317	Deputy Independent counsel Sol Wisenberg: “The question is if Monica Lewinsky	J.B.C.	-	1/6/1999
1316	Could you possibly be as dense as you are acting? Here, I'll repost the rel	Bill	-	1/6/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):