SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MCI Communications (MCIC)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1692 1 0 MCIC
Emcee:  Thomas J Pittman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1342 Yes indeedy. As I have been promising they would ever since GTE bid (esp. on thdougjn-11/10/1997
1341 Worldcom ups bid to $50 per share biz.yahoo.comrsc-11/10/1997
1340 The usual legal standard is -- i don't recall exactly-- but on the order ofdougjn-11/7/1997
1339 If the rule is all about barriers, then both have a ton. There are quite a few ironROD-11/7/1997
1338 Barriers to entry is a key antitrust concept. Antitrust is the only regulatorydougjn-11/7/1997
1337 Dougin, <b>ÿ But, </b> if the ruler of "<i>what isironROD-11/7/1997
1336 Because it is an entrenched local access monopoly in many of its markets. Hisdougjn-11/7/1997
1335 < GTE now unchanged (3:40) with Dow down 175, while Wcom down a full point. david thor-11/7/1997
1334 dougin, "<i>DOJ could be determinative, but if anything GTE has greironROD-11/7/1997
1333 Interesting! GTE ends up nearly a point, Wcom down 1 1/8. MCI ends very strongM.A. Miller-11/7/1997
1332 GTE now unchanged (3:40) with Dow down 175, while Wcom down a full point. JustM.A. Miller-11/7/1997
1331 Ron, I think you're right in that GTE has something up their sleeve to comTed Downs-11/7/1997
1330 DOJ could be determinative, but if anything GTE has greater problem I believe. dougjn-11/7/1997
1329 Do you think that GTE would assume that WCOM (who is very able) would raise theRon Dior-11/7/1997
1328 <<You know it irritates me to be dead on right in what I say repeatedly oTed Downs-11/7/1997
1327 Say there is something going on. If WCOM is the successful bidder any guesses oDavid Klein-11/7/1997
1326 More specifically, those out of know selling, arbs backing up the truck. Regardougjn-11/7/1997
1325 yesdougjn-11/7/1997
1324 Something's up. Opened down to 36 5/8 on market weakness and just now poppM.A. Miller-11/7/1997
1323 brain challenged.dougjn-11/6/1997
1322 You know it irritates me to be dead on right in what I say repeatedly on this sdougjn-11/6/1997
1321 Ted, Do you have any last minute predictions? From your article, it sounds asironROD-11/6/1997
1320 A Wcom deal can't happen w/out a raise; arbs would vote against. But Wcom dougjn-11/6/1997
1319 Doug I also read the BT statement this morning as being very positive to "CharlieS-11/6/1997
1318 Quietness in public because there is mad negotiating going on behind the scenesdougjn-11/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News