SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Berkshire Hathaway Class B
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1652 93 0 BRK.B
Emcee:  Patricia W. Harris Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1352 >> Remember, that everyone that has held for more than about two years isw molloy-2/13/2000
1351 Such underperformance in one of the greatest bull markets in history isn't Charles Tutt-2/13/2000
1350 Zero, plaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaallllllleeeeeeeeeeeesse. a. BRK already announced tThe Duke of URL©-2/13/2000
1349 Duker, I surely hope that WEB will start buy back shares, it will boost the cozyx1996-2/12/2000
1348 I disagree. Buying in shares is a legitimate way to increase the value of the Charles Tutt-2/12/2000
1347 Buying back stock is a material development that management has to disclose to Dale Baker-2/12/2000
1346 Duker or anyone else, Enjoyed your post. If WB were to buy back shares is he reGary Kline-2/12/2000
1345 Lucid' excerpt from <i>Barron's</i>(?): ... Berkshire HathDuker-2/12/2000
1344 Jocelyn, I would buy the fact that the 'redemption theory' is indeed aDuker-2/11/2000
1343 One of the most believable reasons to explain the price drop has to be this, foJocelyn Ally-2/11/2000
1342 I am just amazed at these rumors. Of all the companies and all the stocks in tDuker-2/11/2000
1341 Yet another rumor, more serious this time, about GenRe and bonds: economist.comJocelyn Ally-2/11/2000
1340 This is an excerpt from an interview with L.Navellier: Navellier continues, &DepyDog-2/10/2000
1339 Cnbc reported that along with denying the rumors BRK also denied the rumor of aThe Duke of URL©-2/10/2000
1338 I agree...Yahoo boards are the pits! Dep <eom> DepyDog-2/10/2000
1337 Now they are slamming chat rooms. Great. There wasn't 1 comment here that w16yearcycle-2/10/2000
1336 CNBC to have news re:Berkshire in just a few minutes. Dep DepyDog-2/10/2000
1335 Brk is saying rumors about Buffett's health are false.16yearcycle-2/10/2000
1334 Comments from M.R. Greenberg (AIG): At December 31, 1999, AIG's consolidatDuker-2/10/2000
1333 I would add that inadequate premiums for the industry bodes well for BRK (I tooDuker-2/10/2000
1332 <i>I am concerned about the statement in the last quarterly (Sept) that tThe Duke of URL©-2/10/2000
1331 "Underwriting fees for the re-insurance business is inadequate." Thatzyx1996-2/10/2000
1330 Buffett Friends Say His Health Is Fine omaha.com Published Wednesday FebruaryHenrik-2/10/2000
1329 <i>I am sure BRK would have bought General Re for cash and stock instead Al Chechatka-2/10/2000
1328 <i>At September 99, Berkshire had, per B share equivalent: $787 in Al Chechatka-2/10/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News