SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
RAMTRONIAN's Cache Inn
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
14464 65 0
Emcee:  NightOwl Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13539Why Mr. Owl, you just admitted that "all is one"! <ggg> CongratNorrin Radd-8/7/2007
13538P.S. And as long as you are down there on your knees anyway... you might want toNightOwl-8/6/2007
13537Looks like Mom & Pop got a bad case of Weekend Terrors... I suspect this silNightOwl-8/6/2007
13536What? Didn't you see all the episodes?? There is no "other" side NightOwl-8/6/2007
13535Bush's poll numbers are 8x better than the democrats....lol zogby.com Survlongnshort-8/4/2007
13534Mr. Owl, you are simply not fooling anyone! Look at your own optimism for RMTR!Norrin Radd-8/4/2007
13533Haaaaaa! Hooooo! ...Hoooo? <b><i>I dared to betray him to save EartNightOwl-8/4/2007
13532Mr. Owl, GW wants to know what you're reading... (cause he's jealous..Norrin Radd-8/4/2007
13531Uh, Mr. Owl, the "Destroyer of Worlds" is actually "Galactus"Norrin Radd-8/3/2007
13530I say some stocks will be up and some down. I hope my long stocks are up and my longnshort-8/3/2007
13529Well Mr. Longnshort... What's it going to be? Capitulation Friday? ...EaglNightOwl-8/3/2007
13528Well Mr. Radd... I would have thought the "Destroyer of Worlds" woulNightOwl-8/3/2007
13527And it's on GWs and Gonzales' faces. Well, just counting the days untilNorrin Radd-8/2/2007
13526But Franklin was ok with intercepting messages between the British and loyalistslongnshort-8/2/2007
13525One more laugh and I'm out of here: "<u><b>Sarbanes-Oxley NightOwl-8/2/2007
13524I just read over the presentation slides posted from Denali's recent MemCon NightOwl-8/2/2007
13523Well Mr. Radd... If we're going to start slicing up the pie based on what fNightOwl-8/2/2007
13522Well... It seems to me that RMTR is still lacking the necessary "keys"NightOwl-8/2/2007
13521And HSOA. They will behave well only if one wants to make a profit. Otherwise,Norrin Radd-8/1/2007
13520"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safetNorrin Radd-8/1/2007
13519Well... nothing lasts forever: <b>In early 2006, the 109th Congress passeNightOwl-8/1/2007
13518You think <b>they</b> are "behaving quite well?????!" WelNightOwl-8/1/2007
13517I guess dead dogs don't bounce very well judging by the market today. HowevNorrin Radd-8/1/2007
13516Ha! BTW, what are we doing here????? <ggg> Glad I have at least someone tNorrin Radd-7/30/2007
13515Hoo! Hoo! Haaa! I like to think of it as just another of your many costs of freNightOwl-7/30/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):