SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Merck
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1580 80 0 MRK
Emcee:  Alfred W. Post Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1355An Idea Gone Haywire: Linking Executive Pay to Sales By GRETCHEN MORGENSON WHY Mick Mørmøny-7/14/2002
1354Well, the general market decline you have now also and I think this is more distAlfred W. Post-7/11/2002
1353Merck is approaching historically undervalued levels here. If it hits 40, then sea_biscuit-7/10/2002
1352It is terrible that such faulty recordings did occur, but I do not think that onAlfred W. Post-7/9/2002
1351CNBC analyst says it's consistent with the "GAP" regulations, and E-7/8/2002
1350<i>Drug giant Merck & Co . recorded $12.4 billion in revenue from the E-7/8/2002
1349Where is the fraud in what they did?pvz-7/8/2002
1348down 10%. will it still sell 20% of medco?hdl-7/8/2002
1347how is merck trading in germany?hdl-7/8/2002
1346Massive fraud exposed at Merck: Looking like it will open down 25-50% today. TKeepItSimple-7/8/2002
1345As I heard with the introduction of a generica Merckwill have to settle with mucAlfred W. Post-4/25/2002
1344With Fosamax listed as 1 of the 5 "Key" franchise drugs for MRK, (FOSASHELTIE-4/24/2002
1343MRK is probably a good buy at 46 or around that, when the div yield crosses 3%. sea_biscuit-4/9/2002
1342SHELTIE, go here Message 17239669 and look around this post for other MRK posPaul Senior-3/28/2002
1341Could you direct me to the value investing thread? ThanksSHELTIE-3/27/2002
1340John A. Stoops: fyi, pertinent discussion on MRK occurring now on "Value InPaul Senior-3/26/2002
1339Paul, Any idea why MRK continues to slide? JohnJohn A. Stoops-3/26/2002
1338Thanks. I'm not an AIM proponent, but if history of MRK and success of AIM Paul Senior-12/12/2001
1337Hi, At the closing price today I am getting instructions to increase my holdingsBernie Goldberg-12/12/2001
1336Bernie, if I might ask, what does AIM say to do with MRK now? I've startePaul Senior-12/12/2001
1335I wrote puts on pfe and mrk today: Mrk jan 03 $60 @ 7.50 and pfe mar 40 @ 2.75.pvz-12/12/2001
1334Let's keep in touch on this. Stocks don't always move to the ideal priciStephen M. DeMoss-12/12/2001
1333I agree with your thinking about where mrk might go. At $52, the current 2% dpvz-12/12/2001
1332I've been trading Mrk for a while now, looking for a good long term entry poStephen M. DeMoss-12/12/2001
1331Merck finally fesses up to the patent expiration problem that lots of people havLighthouse-12/11/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News