SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
NEORX(nerx)
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
661 19 0 NERX
Emcee:  trevor john wilkinson Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
136 Excellent points. If this company cannot take reasonable care of its stock holKenneth E. De Paul-7/10/1997
135 MWP: Still have not forgotten about the cytokine issue. I tried a coupla' sWilliam J. Leiby-7/10/1997
134 His stock picks were up 27% so far this year and he added this to his list, butKenneth E. De Paul-7/7/1997
133 Hi: Ah, some more frustrated long-term shareholders. Jeez, how misery loves coWilliam J. Leiby-7/5/1997
132 Hi again, I've held this stock for years and it's basically done nothimichael d kugler-7/5/1997
131 What reasons did Stovall give for liking the preferred of this stock? Did he gisteinman-7/5/1997
130 Stovall on Wall St. Week just selected this preferred stock for his picks for tKenneth E. De Paul-7/4/1997
129 Hi Mike, We have to stop meeting like this.. This company sure does move slosteinman-7/4/1997
128 I have held this stock for a number of years now. It has been largely a disappomichael d kugler-7/4/1997
127 Bill, this thread has become very quiet lately..........Stock reminds me of a bJ.T.-7/1/1997
126 JT: Notwithstanding today's volume (@ 40 mins b4 the close), I am becoming William J. Leiby-6/27/1997
125 Ken, NERX doesn't have to make any noise. Have you noticed the volume in thJ.T.-6/26/1997
124 Now if Nerx just would make some noise/news at the JNJ doorstep, we would be inKenneth E. De Paul-6/26/1997
123 MWP, Great Find. Too bad for JNJ..................<ggggggg>. Looks like JJ.T.-6/26/1997
122 Bill/JT: Gee maybe this decision will get the ink flowing!! (http://biz.yahooMWP-6/26/1997
121 JT: Yeah I saw that. Indeed, there was some solid buying starting around 3:19 PWilliam J. Leiby-6/25/1997
120 Bill, 4 block trades happened in the last hour: 10k @ 4 3/8 3.19 E;, 40k @ 4 J.T.-6/25/1997
119 MWP, talk about the MM's doing a "wash-out" play. IMHO, this tactJ.T.-6/25/1997
118 MWP: If the recent past trading is any indicator, perhaps you may be right. IWilliam J. Leiby-6/25/1997
117 Bill, I'm still VERY confident that the deal will be announced within the MWP-6/25/1997
116 Also, some of the selling might be in response to Immunex's (IMNX) news relWilliam J. Leiby-6/24/1997
115 JT: Ordinarily, I would be inclined to agree with you. But after some shufflingWilliam J. Leiby-6/24/1997
114 Bill, The stock doesn't have enough muster at this point to get over 5, I&#J.T.-6/24/1997
113 JT: I love the fact that there is another guy trying to cheer this stock on. BuWilliam J. Leiby-6/20/1997
112 NERX is 4 3/4 to 4 13/16------------- POP BABY POP----------------------JTJ.T.-6/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):