SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GX Investors Thread
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
586 21 0 GX
Emcee:  qveauriche Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
136Qveaupauvre... OUCH. Thats cold, Md. I'm afraid you may be right about qveauriche-8/26/2001
135To:qveaupauvre >DBAB remains bullish< Great post but who is going to step MDGO-8/26/2001
134DBAB remains bullish excerpts from dbab released 8/24/01. I think this was releqveauriche-8/26/2001
133Excellent point. "Let's focus on making some money with GX stock; lonKevRupert-8/25/2001
132Good advice.(eom)qveauriche-8/25/2001
131<<The quality of the exchange of ideas is the issue. The hostility this siSawtooth-8/25/2001
130Because that was directed at me, I will ignore it. I make no presumptions about qveauriche-8/25/2001
129qveauriche, Do you think anyone really cares if they get "banned" froKevRupert-8/25/2001
128I posted this on the other thread in response to a post by Ally. I am for now liqveauriche-8/25/2001
127Dear Sir, They say they had 2 B to start the third qrt.. For the rest of the yeterridex-8/24/2001
126And the whole problem just might be this: "I don't care what the compaBWAC-8/24/2001
125Well, I decided to place a skeptical eye upon GX and look at the quarterly resultrainleaving-8/24/2001
124<< GX needs to grow at 5% on average qrt.to qrt. to get to 2.8 B adj EBIDTDukeCrow-8/24/2001
123Dear Sir, Since I think the growth rate of this company is the is the answer toterridex-8/24/2001
122>My 2B$ guestimate is simply based on an average 5 year depreciation time (liAlly-8/24/2001
121CF, I agree with that. There were other considerations. I appreciate your voicTheophile-8/24/2001
120<i>My 2B$ guestimate is simply based on an average 5 year depreciation timDavid C. Burns-8/23/2001
119There is an interesting comparison to be made in looking at the short interest oCF Rebel-8/23/2001
118Martin, Everyone seems to think that a buyout of GX, were it to come to that, wCF Rebel-8/23/2001
117Martin, I think OT posts such as that ought to be avoided. It just adds fuel tCF Rebel-8/23/2001
116>> Remember Sheldon implying that he (or his firm) has "cracked"Spekulatius-8/23/2001
115I don't remember seeing this posted. biz.yahoo.com Wednesday August 22, 7:John Biddle-8/23/2001
114Spooky, isn't it??? PS Us "Cockroaches" are resilient little bugAndriy Turhovach-8/23/2001
113I have attempted to ban Bo Maslanka, but I continue to receive the error messageqveauriche-8/23/2001
112"I am enjoying the fresh aire of this new venue, " Is that because yoAndriy Turhovach-8/23/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):