SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1363McNabb Brothers, I went through the same thing with Taylor a few months ago thaLou Weed-8/10/2000
1362David, >>The next time that you call me something derogatory in a public McNabb Brothers-8/10/2000
1361Hey, I am many things but I think I have been incredibly fair to this group. MDavid W. Taylor-8/10/2000
1360David, I'm neither long or short CNXT, but looking to go long and have beenMcNabb Brothers-8/10/2000
1359Yawn...David W. Taylor-8/10/2000
1358What do I need to defend? A growth rate of 40% is unlikely in the extreme. I wDavid W. Taylor-8/10/2000
1357You are correct, on all points. I was attempting to draw David into a defense ogpowell-8/10/2000
1356Worse than dead money. Dead money surely means that the value of the stock stayDavid W. Taylor-8/9/2000
1355I appreciate your response and you are exactly right. I have spoken with Michaeirishdragonfly-8/9/2000
1354Actually, I didn't make that claim, someone else did. I merely supported thMeDroogies-8/9/2000
1353No, you've made claims about the larger economic factors as the cause of CNXMeDroogies-8/9/2000
1352The rule of thumb for calculating the ``fair'' PE of a stock is a littleBernard Levy-8/9/2000
1351Does anyone seen this? biz.yahoo.comThai Chung-8/9/2000
1350Thread- A re-write of some earlier news that puts the Conexant DOCSIS qualificatMikeM54321-8/9/2000
1349<I>Growing a business at 40% per annum is not quite that bad but clearly ugpowell-8/9/2000
1348>> Please support this statement with your own thoughts. Also it would be David W. Taylor-8/9/2000
1347<I>My argument has always been that those growth numbers were inherently fgpowell-8/9/2000
1346Yes, the growth predictions were always being touted by the members of this boarDavid W. Taylor-8/9/2000
1345Not that I expect you to understand this, but I'll try anyway. The top line gpowell-8/9/2000
1344$9 to go.... Looks like a majority of CNXT holders are finally waking up. ThisDavid W. Taylor-8/8/2000
1343RF Micro Devices Announces Production Orders with Sanyo Story Filed: Fridaw molloy-8/4/2000
1342CNXT downgrade biz.yahoo.comw molloy-8/4/2000
1341Why look at that initial digit!! Maybe the Universe is an inherently rational pDavid W. Taylor-8/4/2000
1340I count 5 DOCSIS certified chip makers. TI, BRCM, CNXT, RF Micro, Intel (througgpowell-8/2/2000
1339Lots of reasons for the lags... I agree it's premature - I'm just workMeDroogies-8/2/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News