Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters"

An SI Board Since December 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2390	1	0

Emcee: rodster397	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1365	Pretty lame response. Sticks and stones...you know the rest.	jim kelley	-	1/10/1999
1364	Good luck to you Darrell, but if the liberals really would try to answer those	Bob Lao-Tse	-	1/10/1999
1363	<i>Clinton did the best he could with the impossible situation of having	Bob Lao-Tse	-	1/10/1999
1362	Please, answer the question? <i>What do you think would have happened if	Catfish	-	1/10/1999
1361	Try not to be stupid. Robertson and Falwell haven't had any real pull in t	Bob Lao-Tse	-	1/10/1999
1360	No I don't, cause when Newt Gingrich lied under oath where were the Republi	Patricia Trinchero	-	1/10/1999
1359	You don't think lying under oath or obstruction of justice has anything to	Frank Griffin	-	1/10/1999
1358	<i>Simply put, people do not want to disclose their personal lives to a b	Bob Lao-Tse	-	1/10/1999
1357	and well accepted by both Clinton and the Democratic Congress in 1994 (see my p	Peter O'Brien	-	1/10/1999
1356	The same judge that threw the case out also had ruled that the trial couldn'	Peter O'Brien	-	1/10/1999
1355	So ride roughshod over people and their private lives....... Your views would h	jim kelley	-	1/10/1999
1354	Clinton did the best he could with the impossible situation of having one's	Patricia Trinchero	-	1/10/1999
1353	What do you think would have happened if Clinton DID NOT lie before a grand jur	Catfish	-	1/10/1999
1352	What upsets me most about this Senate trial is that it is not about legality a	Patricia Trinchero	-	1/10/1999
1351	<i>Simply put, people do not want to disclose their personal lives to a b	Bob Lao-Tse	-	1/10/1999
1350	Clinton was not testifying in a criminal case. It was a CIVIL case. His testimo	jim kelley	-	1/9/1999
1349	Now there's a nice mature, well reasoned comment.	The Philosopher	-	1/9/1999
1348	Impeachment=Insult to all Voters? That would be true if we lived in a democrac	Luke Duke	-	1/9/1999
1347	Bravo - They should 'Cuff' the 'Scumbag' and drag his ass to &#	Peter S. Maroulis	-	1/9/1999
1346	If you can Dennis Miller on HBO had an interesting rant on how Jefferson would	the gator	-	1/9/1999
1345	We're not talking about a moral issue. This person swore to uphold the cons	RB	-	1/9/1999
1344	Howard Stern jumped on the bandwagon this morning with an interview of the alle	Tom Swift	-	1/8/1999
1343	What is Starr's new strategy, indict anyone supportive of Clinton or again	the gator	-	1/8/1999
1342	Christopher, the allegedly staid BBC was relaying a story from the Star. That	Daniel Schuh	-	1/8/1999
1341	Here we are folks with yet another example of the liberal press! lol	Patricia Trinchero	-	1/8/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):