SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
SCHWAB IPO ALERT THREAD
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2276 41 0
Emcee:  Topannuity Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1376 Schwab already has been one of the official underwriters in a few offerings. AGordon Gekko-9/19/1999
1375 Larry, sounds good. 100 shares for every poster on SI:-). That will make my dTIG-9/18/1999
1374 50 shares each and more allocations limited to those with higher bankroll. Whacapitalistbeatnik-9/18/1999
1373 Actually, I'll propose one. They should provide increased allocations to tLabrador-9/18/1999
1372 Isn't it shocking that not 1 single person has proposed IPO rules that woulsjemmeri-9/18/1999
1371 I am stunned... the talk around here is that the commissions from an active traDavid Petty-9/18/1999
1370 TIG, A person at Schwab told me that their most profitable business is Mutual FLarryCPA-9/18/1999
1369 <i>Also, I still do not think account size should be the dominant factor Gordon Gekko-9/18/1999
1368 The longevity factor does not carry enough weight. GGGordon Gekko-9/18/1999
1367 I agree re dropping Gold and upping the balance requirement to $100k. I suspecVIXandMore-9/18/1999
1366 Gordon, I like that idea that you have too be with Schwab for a year before quaTIG-9/18/1999
1365 Excellent ideas Gordon. I actually askedSchwab about 4 months ago if they are AUrush-9/18/1999
1364 >>If I were Schwab I would cater to my existing clientele because they aLabrador-9/18/1999
1363 >>100K isn't high enough. DLJ and Discover have this and its still mLabrador-9/18/1999
1362 <<could you elaborate more about MSDW IPO allocation? Do you mean your frstockman_scott-9/18/1999
1361 My suggestion would be to group the clients into different tiers, and then alloCarl R.-9/18/1999
1360 How about adding a minimum years of service requirement in order to receive IPOGordon Gekko-9/18/1999
1359 Which of the following would be better for Schwab? 1) Keep the IPO allocation Gordon Gekko-9/18/1999
1358 Well said Carl. Schwab has better execution of orders and I like that very mucTIG-9/18/1999
1357 To those thinking of leaving, let me add that one of the great things about SchCarl R.-9/17/1999
1356 I'm sure that being with Discover will not be the same as being with MorganCarl R.-9/17/1999
1355 I agree, but... 100K isn't high enough. DLJ and Discover have this and itcapitalistbeatnik-9/17/1999
1354 GG The ONLY reason that I went to Schwab was for the IPOs. I went Platinum and LarryCPA-9/17/1999
1353 Schwab has a lot more class than E*Trade and ultimately I don't think they Gordon Gekko-9/17/1999
1352 GG; I've been thinking along your lines for a while but I don't think iLarryCPA-9/17/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News