SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3276 17 0 DEC
Emcee:  Dave Gahm Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1376 JC you are right. Check out this link, I think DEC has an oppertunity if they cDean Amo-5/25/1997
1375 Charles; Thought you might be interested in the following: 1) DEC crossed itstock bull-5/24/1997
1374 Thank you, JC. In each of the last 2 quarters, DEC "pre-annaounced" Charles Skeen-5/24/1997
1373 Correction: DEC beat sharply revised downward earnings estimates for the last tJC-5/24/1997
1372 Charles, DEC has beat earnings estimates the last two quarters.Dean Amo-5/23/1997
1371 Bob; Thanks for the clarification on Claflin. If he needs more power, maybe thstock bull-5/23/1997
1370 I don't think that there is a problem at this point in airing out "intBob Walsh-5/23/1997
1369 Charles; Great summary...and I can't disagree with anything that you postestock bull-5/23/1997
1368 I have to concede that there are probably several factors that have driven DEC&Charles Skeen-5/23/1997
1367 I'll add my two cents. I think the idea of a group of institutional investPaul Mathis-5/23/1997
1366 Charles/SB:, a positive management change HAS just happened: Claflin. Just looTom M-5/23/1997
1365 Good news: Intel (INTC) may be in for a tougher battle with Digital (DEC) over Anand V-5/23/1997
1364 This is not an "institutional shareholder uprising", it is a forum prGreg Jung-5/23/1997
1363 Mr. Bluff; Since I follow an asset allocation model, I won't be adding anystock bull-5/23/1997
1362 Charles; Thanks for your response. Do you think the shareholder action is the stock bull-5/23/1997
1361 I would like to know if you are planning to add to your large position in DEC MrBluff-5/23/1997
1360 This development (institutional shareholder uprising) is much more likely to beCharles Skeen-5/23/1997
1359 Bob, How do you view this "organized" movement on the part of the mastock bull-5/23/1997
1358 Institutional shareholders of DEC meeting in New York next month will seek anBob Walsh-5/23/1997
1357 It's good to see that not everyone involved with DEC is an NT bigot. VMS iJohn M. Zulauf-5/22/1997
1356 The clustering scaling numbers are "general" rule of thumb for clusteJohn M. Zulauf-5/22/1997
1355 Rob, Your enthusiastic and apparently very informed support of VMS fills my heJeff Miller-5/22/1997
1354 John, Appreciate your comments but let me focus on this paragraph: Take for eRob Young-5/22/1997
1353 Hi John, just curious where are you getting these numbers for NT scalability? Dean Amo-5/22/1997
1352 I hope DEC slows down INTEL, hearing Grove et. al. comment how they can't cJohn M. Zulauf-5/22/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News