SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
A Neutral Corner
An SI Board Since September 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2253 11 0
Emcee:  Constant Reader Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1378 Maybe it was "nuance". Or is that nit-picking? :) But they realTimF-11/2/2005
1377If the vaccine is non-mandatory they probably wouldn't be telling you, or meepicure-11/2/2005
1376<i>In fact if they succeed in keeping it non-mandatory they are increasingLane3-11/2/2005
1375It isn't up to Focus on the Family, or any other group to dictate to you howTimF-11/2/2005
1374It is unfortunate that Derek did not resist the temptation to respond in kind afConstant Reader-11/2/2005
1373Some people still are, I am sure ;-).Constant Reader-11/2/2005
1372<i>Oh, also the vaccine isn't effective on women who are already sexuaLane3-11/2/2005
1371Some people were against polio vaccine.Peter Dierks-11/1/2005
1370ROTFLMAO I brought that up to my wife when Bill Bennett was being crucified. ShPeter Dierks-11/1/2005
1369But they might get sick from the meat of those who are fouling the sidewalks in Peter Dierks-11/1/2005
1368If calling your debating counterpart "certifiable" is your idea of <Ilaine-11/1/2005
1367And- there are many more than one type of HPV. If I read corrrectly while skimmiRambi-11/1/2005
1366If the vaccine is for "HPV (human papillomavirus), which is a known to be &Lane3-11/1/2005
1365WEll, you have sent me off on a quest- first about the Pap test: <i>UnforRambi-11/1/2005
1364It seems to me that there are so many good reasons to object to mandatory vaccinLane3-11/1/2005
1363Mandatory is a legitimate concern. Equating this with condom distribution or theConstant Reader-11/1/2005
1362I'm not sure if I "get" this issue. Do we now have an epidemic ofLane3-11/1/2005
1361For some reason, it reminds me of the "niggardly" controversy in WashiConstant Reader-11/1/2005
1360Echos of condom education. Remember how that was going to increase promiscuity? Rambi-11/1/2005
1359This is an interesting issue with lots of facets. Ya gotta wonder about someoneLane3-11/1/2005
1358I hope this doesn't mean you are leaving here for good or anything like thatConstant Reader-11/1/2005
1357I ran across this article on the cervical cancer vaccine this morning. I can'Constant Reader-11/1/2005
1356Maybe a few peregrine falcons would help. Big ones.ManyMoose-11/1/2005
1355This is meant to be a refuge for <i>congenial discussion.</i> While Constant Reader-11/1/2005
1354<i>You're off your rocker, CB.</i> Derek, at this point in timeLane3-11/1/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):