SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
DJT (Trump Casino Hotel)
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
588 7 0 DJT
Emcee:  jian xu Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
138 I think there are a lot of people on this thread who shorted this and want to tJohn L.-6/19/1997
137 Good...crash and burn. Anyone think we will see a new 52 week low now?Laptev-6/19/1997
136 M. carter, I don't do options at this time, but they do seem to have an imRJP-6/19/1997
135 > With DJT, they have already racked up 45% loss, if the stock goes > tRandy Tidd-6/19/1997
134 > You are a wise man! The fools track record sucks. 184% return in 30 monthRandy Tidd-6/19/1997
133 >>Today's price drop: One of the reporters on CNBC mentioned that onevegetarian-6/19/1997
132 Today's price drop: One of the reporters on CNBC mentioned that one of theRJP-6/19/1997
131 According to CNBC this morning Salomon Bros. lowers its estimates on DJT citingRobert Harvey-6/19/1997
130 >>Another inconsistency I found in the Fool portfolio (not the Boring porvegetarian-6/19/1997
129 Leptev, I think overall the Fools do a very good job at educating people. I pJames Wang-6/19/1997
128 Oh wise Dave, since the Fools sold half of their position of IOM and AOL - botLaptev-6/19/1997
127 You are a wise man! The fools track record sucks. THEY DON'T KNOW WHEN TODave Johnson-6/18/1997
126 James, The Fools also keep track of their competition with the indexes on a moLaptev-6/18/1997
125 > Why on earth would you take out the Fool's top two holdings?! Any >Randy Tidd-6/18/1997
124 Your post also reflects my thoughts. I like the Fools balanced approach to invMyron McCrensky-6/18/1997
123 <i>Why on earth would you take out the Fool's top two holdings?! Any James Wang-6/18/1997
122 Why on earth would you take out the Fool's top two holdings?! Any investorLaptev-6/17/1997
121 > I have not seen any research which says that you can buy and hold > risRandy Tidd-6/17/1997
120 The Fool portfolio UNDERPERFORMS the market IF there were no AOL and IOM ! HereJames Wang-6/17/1997
119 >>Well they preach a long-term view, and in their minds, making short-tervegetarian-6/17/1997
118 > I agree that their recent picks have been bad but I don't think it Randy Tidd-6/17/1997
117 I don't think your opinions are very well informed. The Fool portfolio mayRandy Tidd-6/17/1997
116 >>Recently, Fools recomendations are doing so bad. They are making moves vegetarian-6/17/1997
115 Recently, Fools recomendations are doing so bad. They are making moves without Sunny Span-6/17/1997
114 > Beats me, but I also think who would want to buy their stock? yet > pRandy Tidd-6/16/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News