SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Merck
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1580 80 0 MRK
Emcee:  Alfred W. Post Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1380Can anyone validate whether Gilmartin sold half of his Merck stock on the 2nd ofmuddphudd-2/5/2004
1379JAGfn Rumors -----------------------------------------------------------------Home-Run-2/5/2004
1378If I believed the sky was falling, I wouldn't be holding any stocks at all. Hank-1/16/2004
1377Your investments are clearly none of my business. The "G A G" was dirlnkennedy-1/16/2004
1376I responded the way I did because your "Get a grip" comment implied I Hank-1/16/2004
1375The ad Hominem attack is unnecessary. I was thinking and as a result asking quelnkennedy-1/16/2004
1374"Why would you hold/buy PFE etc. if you really believe gas at $3/ gal."Hank-1/16/2004
1373Why would you hold/buy PFE etc. if you really believe gas at $3/ gal. Rumors wilnkennedy-1/15/2004
1372Taking in the whole picture, I believe the overall market is in jeopardy. AlreaHank-1/15/2004
1371I believe it is highly unlikely that you will see Merck any lower than the $40 sKeith Fauci-1/15/2004
1370"Although I've already purchased a little, I'm hoping that MRK willHank-12/31/2003
1369I agree. $40 seems to be the floor after the long drop.Jack Hartmann-12/11/2003
1368Seems like a good time to buy: (1) Entire pharmaceutical sector is out of favorCFA-11/30/2003
136707:37 ET MRK upgraded at Prudential (43.87) -- Update -- Prudential upgradDoc Bones-11/12/2003
1366Muddphudd, <If you are thinking long-term, this may a good time to pick someShawn Donahue-11/7/2003
1365They are below their 52 week low. Merck is a long-term company. Not going anywhmuddphudd-10/27/2003
1364My dad bought MERCK a couple days ago and lost his shirt. Luckily he didn't Oak Tree-10/27/2003
1363<b>Engineered Drugs Open New Issue of Regulation as Patents Expire</b&gDavid C. Burns-8/9/2003
1362Associated Press Merck Announces Terms of Medco Spinoff Tuesday August 5, 5:47 pRon Mgrublian-8/7/2003
1361Trial Lawyers Now Take Aim at Drug Makers Message 18953409David C. Burns-5/18/2003
1360I couldn't agree with you more! But for some reason, when it comes to healtmuddphudd-5/14/2003
1359<b>For Glaxo, the Answers Are in the Pipeline</b> another company wDavid C. Burns-5/4/2003
1358<i> a 'hidden agenda' of making money at the expense of curing disTimF-4/21/2003
1357The pharmaceutical industry cannot be trusted to develop new drugs for 90% of thDavid C. Burns-4/20/2003
1356down a tadhdl-10/18/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):