SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Amgen Inc. (AMGN)
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1906 112 0 AMGN
Emcee:  trevor john wilkinson Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1381Is that you Warren?tom pope-2/17/2007
1380If you see a spike in the volume Tuesday morning its me. I'm gone.SirWalterRalegh-2/17/2007
1379Thanks, Tom, It's been tough to watch the decline since earnings. Yesterdatuck-2/17/2007
1378ML: Case Against Aranesp Builds; But Risk in Stock Data from a new study using tom pope-2/17/2007
1377I thought there was a second one. Here it is. This drug seems to block cancer ceJGoren-2/7/2007
1376Sounds like it. Thanks for the input. All I had heard was a radio report, which JGoren-2/7/2007
1375Are you referring to this one? Message 23256118 Don't get your shorts in atuck-2/6/2007
1374Does anyone have information on the research for that new drug that kills cancerJGoren-2/6/2007
1373Does anyone have information on the research for that new drug that kills cancerJGoren-2/6/2007
1372>>Court Rules For Amgen In Enbrel-Related Patent Suit 01/30/2007 Dow Jontuck-1/30/2007
1371thx.kenhott-1/29/2007
1370Merrill: Dear Doctor letter issued on Aranesp mortality data Amgen issued a Deatom pope-1/29/2007
1369Earnings color from TheStreet.com's Marc Lichtenfeld (formerly of Avalon, butuck-1/26/2007
1368Merrill: Guidance reflects uncertainty in ’07 vs ‘06 We believe conservative ‘0tom pope-1/26/2007
1367Amgen Net Rises, But CEO Girds For Tough '07 [WSJ] By MARILYN CHASE JanuaryDoc Bones-1/26/2007
1366<i>Does that mean that Vectibix is over?</i> Vectibix is here to stDewDiligence_on_SI-1/25/2007
1365Does that mean that Vectibix is over?steve kammerer-1/25/2007
1364Vectibix PACCE trial: We can be reasonably sure that, in the preliminary look atDewDiligence_on_SI-1/25/2007
1363R & D expense went up large. Probably 20 cents worth of potential earnings.BWAC-1/25/2007
1362Amgen missed despite beating (slightly) on revenues. Expenses must have been hituck-1/25/2007
1361I still think Amgen filed the documents. The detail that got the analyst's aJGoren-1/25/2007
1360I don't know for sure; I think it was Amgen. If I knew which court the case JGoren-1/24/2007
1359Oh? Do you know who filed the cited documents? If it was Amgen, I doubt the antuck-1/24/2007
1358The patent thing was bound to be short lived, because any real resolution is stiJGoren-1/24/2007
1357Ah, the reason for the weakness comes from a call by FBR concerning the implicattuck-1/24/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):