SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
14627 28 0 PMU
Emcee:  James Cook Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13852Wed Oct 11, 2000 Luicho Drill Results -----------------------------------------Richnorth-10/11/2000
13851Canadian Corporate News --- Hot Off The Wire ===================================DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck-10/11/2000
13850So you think Luicho would only go out for $10/oz? I guess I'm seeing a 100 trusswinter-10/10/2000
13849<<At this price I only need 50 or 60 meters of the upper sandstone layer fClaude Cormier-10/10/2000
13848Thanks, Dianne. With these results, the universe should unfold a little more. Phil Jones-10/10/2000
13847Today I received this information from Barb Henderson: "The next drill resDianne Billows-10/10/2000
13846Not confused about this play at all. At this price I only need 50 or 60 meters orusswinter-10/10/2000
13845I know you are confused. That is why you are a PFG shareholder. "so quitticharred-10/10/2000
13844I'm confused by your response? I thought that's what exploration companirusswinter-10/9/2000
13843PFG made two 25 million US deals in one year. Then you say the worst case is thecharred-10/9/2000
13842Elizabeth, capital costs were alluded to by management in this quote from Tom Shrusswinter-10/8/2000
13841Hank, I'm on the fence on this one, but leaning towards a buy down here @ 1.russwinter-10/8/2000
13840Charred, you're right on the 50c if PFG drops the Luicho option. Be interesPhil Jones-10/8/2000
13839"I would have the basis of a lawsuit based on fraud. I win either way"charred-10/8/2000
13838Well, I assume neither one of us has been on the site, so if you do not trust thhank2010-10/8/2000
13837When you sample a cliff face and also sample a tunnel into the cliff face, and thank2010-10/8/2000
13836You said 1800 X 250 X 50 meters. But some of the drilling shows the zone to be 1charred-10/7/2000
13835"I am a person with enough mining knowledge to know that 6000 assays can nocharred-10/7/2000
13834"3 million ounces at 2.5 g/t, in the top 50 metres" Read my post #137hank2010-10/7/2000
13833Charred: I say intellectually dishonest when you make posts while acknokledginghank2010-10/7/2000
13832Charred: "The other two bottle roll tests average 40%" That is 40%hank2010-10/7/2000
13831"3 million ounces at 2.5g/t, in the top 50 metres", where did you get charred-10/6/2000
13830"intellectually dishonest", you should ask management. I have done my charred-10/6/2000
13829Hank, the geology is different than Piernia. Management can't change that. Scharred-10/6/2000
13828Anyone want to calculate what Barrick thought they were paying per oz Au in the russet-10/6/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):