VIDA - Hot Stock with new prostate procedure

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
VIDA - Hot Stock with new prostate procedure

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
564	5	0	VIDA

Emcee: George Holt	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
139	David, thanks for the article. That's a heads-up for sure. Again, I believe	Bruce Hampton	-	2/28/1997
138	Here's an interesting article on secondary offerings. investor.msn.com	Stratajema	-	2/27/1997
137	Dale. I was glancing through the Urologix prospectus and I happened to notice t	Stratajema	-	2/25/1997
136	Greg. If your looking for additional info on the BPH market and devices, then y	Stratajema	-	2/24/1997
135	As you are listed as a CFA, I would assume you have access to quotes. However,	Greg h2o	-	2/24/1997
134	TO ANY/ALL: For past 15 mns, Vida looks like a great trading stock. Buy @<=	Miles Rhyne Hoffman, CFA	-	2/22/1997
133	Ted, Thanks for shedding some light on how situations like these can be comple	Linda O	-	2/21/1997
132	Ted, appreciate your learned insight into the patent question. Guess it's p	Bruce Hampton	-	2/21/1997
131	I am a patent attorney and have been reading your thread regarding the patent i	tkringsred	-	2/21/1997
130	Linda, David, all: I must concur with David that this mystery concerning the pa	Bruce Hampton	-	2/21/1997
129	Linda. My remarks are centered on the contradictions I have observed between wh	Stratajema	-	2/21/1997
128	Linda, It does seem that their statements over the phone contradict their fili	A.J. Mullen	-	2/21/1997
127	David, Remember, just because somebody files a 144 DOES NOT make them an insid	Linda O	-	2/21/1997
126	>>I can tell you from my own recollection - which is very clear to me as	Stratajema	-	2/20/1997
125	Bruce, I am aware of this reference. For what ever reason (not clear to me) t	Linda O	-	2/20/1997
124	Thanks Dale... Ill be a candidate for the proceedure in another few years, so m	Boyce Burge	-	2/20/1997
123	Linda, your assertion that there are no pending lawsuits or patent interference	Bruce Hampton	-	2/20/1997
122	<< any lurkers who have actually undergone a TUNA proceedure? I have not	BDR	-	2/19/1997
121	There are NO lawsuits currently with the Company. There WAS a lawsuit brought	Linda O	-	2/19/1997
120	Linda, having worked there, do you have any thought about the pending lawsuit (	bruce wilks	-	2/16/1997
119	Linda, it's good to hear from someone close to the co. What's your tak	A.J. Mullen	-	2/15/1997
118	a buying opportunity? or has the TUNA gone bad? --db	Doug Baer	-	2/14/1997
117	Hi Floyd, Thanks for your comments. It could be that there are several pre-IP	Linda O	-	2/14/1997
116	Hi Linda: I appreciate your note. EDGAR did seem to list several 144 filings,	dfloydr	-	2/14/1997
115	Do we have any lurkers who have actually undergone a TUNA proceedure? Sure woul	Boyce Burge	-	2/13/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):