SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
14451 67 0 SGI
Emcee:  Fan Jiao Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13951Charles No, I ask the question as I wanted to pose it. The question you believMJ-9/12/2005
13950The question you _should_ be asking is how essential SGI's current shareholdCharles Tutt-9/12/2005
13949I have to be somewhere this afternoon-----I do have a question that I would likeMJ-9/12/2005
13948I agree that Montecito based machines will be good. However, as the Montecito sWes-9/12/2005
13947Wes, Those should be good machines, offering good performance. Montecito chip Joe NYC-9/12/2005
13946OK, although I think that answer is somewhat flip, what's your take on this Wes-9/12/2005
13945neolib, <i>So SGI's current lineup is approaching EOL, and their IP nJoe NYC-9/12/2005
13944Wes, <i>What is your take on this article?</i> I agree with this pJoe NYC-9/12/2005
13943Another possible reason why Intel might pick them up. On their own, I doubt theneolib-9/12/2005
13942What is your take on this article? theinquirer.netWes-9/11/2005
13941Interesting thoughts, but I frankly don't think Itanium was making much progCharles Tutt-9/11/2005
13940Charles, <i>I doubt the plan would have worked even without AMD. After alJoe NYC-9/11/2005
13939I doubt the plan would have worked even without AMD. After all, the Itanium wasCharles Tutt-9/11/2005
13938<i> There are other possibilities, that may not be favorable to the sharehneolib-9/11/2005
13937neolib, <i> Intel incorrectly thought that their dominant market positionJoe NYC-9/11/2005
13936neolib Thanks for the feedback. DonDon Green-9/11/2005
13935First stock I every owned, back a couple of decades almost. Bought it at aroundneolib-9/11/2005
13934neolib What even attracted you to this stock and why would you even consider inDon Green-9/11/2005
13933The history of the last 15 years in CPU design has rather convincingly shown thaneolib-9/11/2005
13932Wes, SGI is one of the top 2 vendors of Itanium systems (HP is the other). TheJoe NYC-9/10/2005
13931Charles, <i>I think SGI settled its long term future when it drank the ItJoe NYC-9/10/2005
13930Granville was early in the technical game. His system of analysis works-----bMJ-9/9/2005
13929I doubt Itanium will ever fulfill its promise of being a high performance, high Charles Tutt-9/9/2005
13928Wes Burned out! You mean a quick as a fox! Been there, done that vs. Young anDon Green-9/9/2005
13927Yeah, I guess a burned out <i>old fogy</i> like you would know aboutWes-9/9/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News