SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Jim's Nasdaq100 Special as a basket.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2103 37 0 QQQQ
Emcee:  James F. Hopkins Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1403 OX, Now I'm wondering if the severe tank in the BPNDX may be a bottom sigstockycd-10/20/1999
1402 Bill, That means we rally big time, right????? <ggg> I'm serious! stockycd-10/20/1999
1401 that would be too easy if your theory worked all the time <g> tell us wheOX-10/20/1999
1400 I agree. BTW, my NDXBP theory fell apart, unless we go down hard for the rest stockycd-10/20/1999
1399 Jim, I have been watching the SI survey stats... when the 24 hour got to 0 bulWilliam H Huebl-10/20/1999
1398 My QQQ hourly stuff got long this AM after gettting whipped in and out over theStoctrash-10/20/1999
1397 i was going to reply to your post last night and say how 2400 looked like resisOX-10/20/1999
1396 I'm not sure about the rally yet..still looks shaky , ,I'm breaking oneJames F. Hopkins-10/20/1999
1395 50.00 10MA BPNDX 56.00 58.00 55.00 57.00 58.00 54.00 47.00 45.00 34.00 36.00OX-10/20/1999
1394 Jim, <...but the big drop is subject to come when none of us are looking.&gWilliam H Huebl-10/20/1999
1393 Right now it looks like a suckers rally in the morning.. lots of volatiliy , loJames F. Hopkins-10/20/1999
1392 Jim, Lookin at the the SPY, the volume at the lows isn't even close to whaWilliam H Huebl-10/19/1999
1391 Ox, and thread, Actually, this is a super interesting situation. The NDXBP tastockycd-10/19/1999
1390 Bill ; The $ don't seem to be able to hold on to any gains she makes..if yoJames F. Hopkins-10/19/1999
1389 OX, 9 point drop!!!! run for the hills...<gggg> Chris stockycd-10/19/1999
1388 51.70 10MA BPNDX 53.00 56.00 58.00 55.00 57.00 58.00 54.00 47.00 45.00 34.00OX-10/18/1999
1387 Jim, HB and GZ said it for me... I am looking for 10,500 before I get back intWilliam H Huebl-10/18/1999
1386 Let me know after you look, I'm kinda ify right now.. James F. Hopkins-10/18/1999
1385 Jim, Sounds right to me. I haven't downloaded yet so I don't know abouWilliam H Huebl-10/18/1999
1384 HI Bill; It seems to be holding its own for now but I'm not sure it's uJames F. Hopkins-10/18/1999
1383 Jim, Near today's highs... USD. Bill William H Huebl-10/18/1999
1382 Hi Bill; I was responding to his post, and telling him I couldn't tell fromJames F. Hopkins-10/18/1999
1381 Hi Dave ; the actual sensitivity will be hard to pin down, as so many other faJames F. Hopkins-10/18/1999
1380 Jim, The thesis that I am testing is the sensitivity of OEX and SPX to the indjjs_ynot-10/18/1999
1379 Jim, As you can see on my web site, I always check OI... and the ratio betweenWilliam H Huebl-10/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News