SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE)
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
14577 37 0 SIII
Emcee:  stock talk Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
14077 I made a mistake re: S3 realization of UMC shares. someone else posted it was Bill Lin-1/31/2000
14076 Yes, it was an enlightening presentation. I also picked up the Allanis MorisetBill Lin-1/31/2000
14075 If you listened to the liquid audio presentation, you should be question if theSBHX-1/31/2000
14074 <<Why would a big artist stay with a record label and get 10% of his recCMon-1/31/2000
14073 I just think MP3 will be another internet industry that will revolutionize the Herc-1/31/2000
14072 Pick up a copy of Barron's. The "Asian Trader" column addressed tCMon-1/31/2000
14071 OFF TOPIC: Herc, I disagree... EMI is a goldmine. (Holds Capitol Records labelJohn Nasser-1/31/2000
14070 Here's what I picked up from the SNDK thread on24.com For those who don&#SBHX-1/30/2000
14069 Upon further experience with my new Rio 500, I stand corrected. Some of the hiHerc-1/30/2000
14068 thanks very much. does anyone have any idea why TSM trades at such a premium tBill Lin-1/29/2000
14067 Bill, If you need to track UMC price, here's what was posted earlier in tSBHX-1/29/2000
14066 I have owned SIII for a number of years and this is the latest I can ever recalRichard McMorrow-1/28/2000
14065 While I justify my investment in the solid book value of S3 through it's UMMighty Mizzou-1/28/2000
14064 Just bought some more UMC, I mean SIII after reading this little blurb: news.cMighty Mizzou-1/28/2000
14063 BWA HA HA HASir Auric Goldfinger-1/28/2000
14062 Earnings out Jan31 2000. My mistake. I could have sworn it was Jan25.eom.SBHX-1/27/2000
14061 When is the earnings out again? Did I miss it? It's supposed to be out bySBHX-1/27/2000
14060 thanksBill Lin-1/27/2000
14059 <<What is the UMC value today marked to market for SIII? Is it higher orCMon-1/27/2000
14058 According to you, Value players already knew the value of the UMC stake, so theBill Lin-1/27/2000
14057 A distinct possibility. S3 definitely chosen to be off the INTC reservation. ThCMon-1/27/2000
14056 I believe that S3 pissed off Intel when S3 allied itself with IBM. Now Intel iJohn Lynch-1/27/2000
14055 <<Are you pointing out that I'm mediocre?>> Didn't think ICMon-1/27/2000
14054 That was a rude post. Are you pointing out that I'm mediocre? Marking to Bill Lin-1/27/2000
14053 If you went to the nasdaq site www.nasdaq, and looked up SIII, and went to afteBill Lin-1/27/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):