SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
American Eco (ECGOF, ECX on Toronto exchange)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2841 13 0 ECX
Emcee:  david james Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
141 I have been following this thread for several months and watched in wonderment MARK BARGER-6/17/1997
140 Another Large Contract: newsalert.com Is this the first time AmEco has had exSeth Weisinger-6/17/1997
139 Chempower has several contracts: biz.yahoo.com Looks like McGinnis is trying tZach E.-6/16/1997
138 AOL, The Motley Fool, Techstocks, etc. provided the overdose of notoriety. Myrityro-6/14/1997
137 Michael, I think the story is that IR says that the debenture holders say theyCzechsinthemail-6/14/1997
136 Jorge, First, let me say I'm long and have been averaging down buying moreCzechsinthemail-6/14/1997
135 According to IR today, the debenture holders aren't shorting. The selling Michael Anthony-6/14/1997
134 >> I think that is setting up a tug of war between value investorJorcas-6/14/1997
133 Zach, Removing the floor on the conversion price was not in shareholders' Czechsinthemail-6/13/1997
132 American Eco begins operations at thermal waste treatment facility: biz.yahoo.cZach E.-6/13/1997
131 David, Thanks for continuing to bring information to the discussion. Though mCzechsinthemail-6/12/1997
130 Phil Thanks for posting we need all the support we can get aroud here? Good toFrederick Menslage-6/12/1997
129 If I recall correctly, don't the market rules make it much harder to be shoPhil Abel-6/12/1997
128 Agree with you, David.... This could be a classic climactic panic selling, whicFrancois H. Gaston-6/12/1997
127 Thanks David, What is your opinion on the techinicals of the chart as to any dFrederick Menslage-6/12/1997
126 - Well, lets consider a few points. McGinnis has told me that he bought to nedavid james-6/12/1997
125 Will the price of the stock be below its annual earnings per share? Something iFrederick Menslage-6/12/1997
124 What the heck is up? Stock price at 5 7/8 at 3:30 pm . Volume 600,000 sharesMARK BARGER-6/12/1997
123 - That's not exactly a mystery since its been public knowledge for about 4 david james-6/12/1997
122 Read the 10k and the mystery will unravel. 2 private placements over the last sjim nazium-6/12/1997
121 Hi David, This seemed most appropriate just in case you missed it. Skeet Shipman-6/12/1997
120 - One of the reasons the company went to the Big 6 firm is that analysts tolddavid james-6/12/1997
119 Do you think the downward pressure on ECGOF will subside after July 28 (or whenZach E.-6/11/1997
118 Can anyone put a positive spin on the removal of the floor on the debentures.srvhap-6/8/1997
117 FM, <i>Am I a Fool for thinking " It's a great buy here, bCzechsinthemail-6/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):