SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MDRX: Allscripts, Inc.
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
716 7 0 MDRX
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
141Call Bill Davis at 847-680-3515 => He takes calls. But, I would look thru thckrunner2001-9/1/2005
140Be interested to know what IR people say. However, I doubt Wieland would get thhappyhawaiian-8/30/2005
139I would suspect that you would find that there are no GAAP impairment rules undeckrunner2001-8/30/2005
138I don't know where Wieland gets his numbers for that assumption. Although Icupiditasradix-8/30/2005
137Re: EMAG. I bought for a trade just prior to earnings. Made a quick 90 cents. happyhawaiian-8/27/2005
136Sorry I haven't checked this board in a while. I VERY much agree that this cupiditasradix-8/26/2005
135Hawaiian- a while back you mentioned EMAG, had a chance to do a little research,mrliny-8/24/2005
134Interesting Press Release- Facey Medical recieves 1.2 million in incentives( formrliny-8/22/2005
133One more comment. It's only a matter of time before some big HCIT sector achappyhawaiian-8/22/2005
132I agree. MDRX is rightly focused on the longer-term, building a roster of reliahappyhawaiian-8/19/2005
131No stated specific target. Their analysis, if MDRX complies, implies a value ofckrunner2001-8/19/2005
130Your insight into QSII confirms suspisions relative to revenue/earnings mentionemrliny-8/19/2005
129Thanks for that. What exactly is his price target? This QSII board fight is hehappyhawaiian-8/19/2005
128Leerink Swann & Co, George Hill Report Date: August 11, 2005 (61 pages) Initckrunner2001-8/17/2005
127My reasons: Medicare Part D advertising is allowed to begin October 1. This wilhappyhawaiian-8/16/2005
126Been trading the ups and downs here since Wieland's downgrade and Cramer'happyhawaiian-8/14/2005
125CK- Thanks for response I do think you are conservative re earnings expectationmrliny-8/11/2005
124Yes, GE is scary. Yes, MDRX did disdain small practices, as they had been burnehappyhawaiian-8/9/2005
123Reply: Please see my post #122. From my long ago posts on Yahoo I have always ckrunner2001-8/9/2005
122<b>HH:</b> Look at millbrook.com It is GE Medical Systems: Who dckrunner2001-8/9/2005
121That's the problem. We haven't seen the committment of $ that the polithappyhawaiian-8/9/2005
120QSII earnings continue to impress, but cause concern re Allscripts. Is is more mrliny-8/8/2005
119I think Wieland is too conservative. MDRX cannot be had as a takeover play for happyhawaiian-8/2/2005
118Cupid: you're very optimistic. But, yes, the software and service sales numhappyhawaiian-7/28/2005
117Agree on CC 1) I am impressed with GT's conservative(some might say overly mrliny-7/27/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News