SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Fonix:Voice Recognition Product (FONX)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3347 45 0 FONX
Emcee:  Dave Rebok Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1422 Bob, if your neither long nor short why are you here? Do you feel it a need toSCRUFF-12/5/1997
1421 Marc, I agree that the chances of getting a viable product to market have incrDr. Bob-12/5/1997
1420 Marc, With the abandonment of the "Plug and Speak" product and the AsRandall E Westberg-12/5/1997
1419 Hi Bob. Just wanted to try and make one point that seems to be missing from thFairways9-12/4/1997
1418 OK, Scruff, one more time for me, then you can have the last word, and we can gDr. Bob-12/4/1997
1417 <<Before you start spouting words you don't understand you may want tjohn harris-12/4/1997
1416 Scruff, <<Bob I'm sorry to come across so rude, but I just feel like Randall E Westberg-12/4/1997
1415 Bob, who cares if Fonix is the first to the market with a product or not. In cSCRUFF-12/4/1997
1414 Marc and Scruff, Marc, you're right - I'm neither long nor short fonixDr. Bob-12/4/1997
1413 Fairways I respect your posts and have really enjoyed your posts. I tactfully SCRUFF-12/4/1997
1412 Scruff, I don't believe Bob is short. Actually, I believe that he is neitFairways9-12/4/1997
1411 Robert, you and all your shorting friends better take cover because here comes SCRUFF-12/4/1997
1410 To all, Check out LHSPF's deal with SGS-Thomson announced today. Similar Dr. Bob-12/4/1997
1409 Ed, There is another part of your post that I completely disagree with. <&lRandall E Westberg-12/4/1997
1408 John, That's the way I read it too, but I give that a little more weight tDr. Bob-12/3/1997
1407 John, You're right. I do have a positive bias toward fonix. I am, in facted doell-12/3/1997
1406 Hi Bob: My understanding of this deal is that it is simply a fee for service tjohn harris-12/3/1997
1405 Hi ed: Well stated, regarding perception. The management of FONX, in my opinionjohn harris-12/3/1997
1404 Marc, I agree with your sentiments, although I would reiterate that neither SiDr. Bob-12/3/1997
1403 Hello Ed, Bob etc. I look at Fonix now vs. a few weeks ago and have to concludFairways9-12/3/1997
1402 fonix (FONX): For the trading day of 12/3/97: Last trade... 4 3/4.... Neted doell-12/3/1997
1401 Ed, I think you have stated the case very clearly and fairly, and can only sayDr. Bob-12/3/1997
1400 Hi SCRUFF, I saw that. Thanks for posting it. The release is on Bloomberg anded doell-12/3/1997
1399 To all: Fonix enters a collaborative agreement with OGI, designed to accelerateSCRUFF-12/3/1997
1398 That could be true. I took an early report, so let's go with your revisioned doell-12/2/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):