SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3276 17 0 DEC
Emcee:  Dave Gahm Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1426 Taby and All; I noted on the Intel thread that Intel would be in violation of stock bull-5/29/1997
1425 Christopher; Lets not forget the group of institutional investors that have jostock bull-5/29/1997
1424 Yes, I think you might find reference to how they keep the plant occupied in reGreg Jung-5/29/1997
1423 Jim, I believe that while sales of Digital's Alpha sales are a bit slow, oSamir Jain-5/29/1997
1422 All, just skip over Victoria Gate. It's a real estate development, not a pTom M-5/29/1997
1421 A couple of years ago, DEC built a large chip plant to produce the Alpha. SinceJim Wojdak-5/29/1997
1420 Intel will not slow down shipment to DEC. It is obligated contractually to supPaul Jamerson-5/29/1997
1419 Will DEC need the Intel processors into 1999 if DEC wins the suit? Without the George Dvorsky-5/29/1997
1418 My personal guess is that DEC is now going to announce a partnership with AMD oChristopher Charles Milas-5/29/1997
1417 Anand, It is John again. While you are busy attacking my character regarding Time Traveler-5/28/1997
1416 Nonsense, it is illegal.Taby-5/28/1997
1415 Anand, <analysts say: .."why else they are stooping to a move so low anAli Chen-5/28/1997
1414 Any company that sells products ans services must make equally avaiable to all Taby-5/28/1997
1413 RE: Intel Lawsuit INTEL's suit seems perfectly appropriate. Why supply buljim kelley-5/28/1997
1412 DEC is in deep do do. INTEL may choose to just slow down shipments of contractwilliet-5/28/1997
1411 What the analysts say: "Cutting off supplies is a riskier move for Intel,Anand V-5/28/1997
1410 LEE About 35 percent of Digital's revenues come from Intel-based products, VICTORIA GATE, MD-5/28/1997
1409 Below is the latest Blomberg News wrap-up on the Intel vs Digtal litigation: __VICTORIA GATE, MD-5/28/1997
1408 I believe that the Robinson-Patman act requires you to sell product to all buyeLee Lindquist-5/28/1997
1407 George an ALL: A few minutes ago I heard an update on the Intel suit. If Intelstock bull-5/28/1997
1406 > or maybe intel want cut off all future corporation with DEC, so DEC > wPeter Hoermann-5/28/1997
1405 >It makes me wonder what Intel is hiding.... What's in those specs >derek cao-5/28/1997
1404 DEC's respond to Intel's law suite: MAYNARD, Mass., May 28 /PRNewswShimon Amir-5/28/1997
1403 This is getting very interesting. Should it even be possible to constrain the Greg Jung-5/28/1997
1402 OR ... Palmer may have jeapordized DEC's future with this lawsuit. PatentBrendan W-5/28/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News