SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Ultra OTC Fund - UOPIX
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2063 27 0 UOPIX
Emcee:  OldAIMGuy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1438Hi Todd, I don't post here, or anywhere else right now :) Anyway, I just sJack Jagernauth-4/18/2001
1437Hi to all Dirty Harry fans, www2.marketwatch.com Okay, yet another article thaTodd Reichardt-4/17/2001
1436Here's historic quotes at SI site. siliconinvestor.comAce Buck-4/16/2001
1435Here's one place to get the data: chart.yahoo.com^NDXTodd Reichardt-4/16/2001
1434Yahoo historical quotes has this data, but I have been unsuccessful retrieving ibob wallace-4/16/2001
1433Hi folks, I need some help and was wondering if anyone can give me some informatBhaskar Sengupta-4/16/2001
1432Hi Tom and all others. It has been great to see the recent increased participativelobob-4/12/2001
1431yes, very interestingbob wallace-4/11/2001
1430Good morning Bob, A nice cozy fire was lit at the open. It will be interesting tOldAIMGuy-4/11/2001
1429Wow! Lookie lookie! UOPIX may bust past 10 today! If this happens, I will finJohn-4/11/2001
1428Hi John I think we already have two good days in a row, it will a very unusual bob wallace-4/11/2001
1427Good Morning Bob, The NDX futures are moving slightly higher this morning! CanJohn-4/11/2001
1426John wrote: In many scenarios, UOPIX investors will experience very disproportioOpenSea-4/10/2001
1425Hi Bernie, Yes, I fully agree with you. In many scenarios, UOPIX investors wilJohn-4/10/2001
1424so who asked?bob wallace-4/10/2001
1423Hi Jim, <i>But John, the issue isn't with the management of the fund.John-4/10/2001
1422John, The only bone I have to pick with ProFunds management is that they charge Bernie Goldberg-4/10/2001
1421Hi Barry, No need to apologize, my friend. No one is perfect. I think the difJohn-4/10/2001
1420I made a simple transcription error. My value was actually 208.71% rather than 3labestul-4/10/2001
1419But John, the issue isn't with the management of the fund. We're just spOpenSea-4/9/2001
1418Hi Barry, Our calculation methods are the same, essentially. I rechecked my daJohn-4/9/2001
1417Bernie, In what way do you see ProFunds as failing to essentially meet the objeJohn-4/9/2001
1416John asked how I calculated the value of 308.71% It is possible that I made an labestul-4/9/2001
1415Hi Jim, After being involved with UOPIX since Dec. of 1998, I share your concernOldAIMGuy-4/9/2001
1414Hi John, I copie this post from the Raging Bull thread on UOPIX. What I would lBernie Goldberg-4/9/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News