SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1894 6 0
Emcee:  Iceberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
144 RE: Summary Post Classification of Problem Posters type I-- irritating, counteStan Walker-4/9/1997
143 Ice/All working on a summary now will have it posted in about 15 minutes.Stan Walker-4/9/1997
142 Re: responding in a positive way. . . . . . The main advantage to doing this isStan Walker-4/9/1997
141 ICE, then you're executive material. GottfriedGottfried-4/9/1997
140 >I try to use non-confrontational prose Gottfried, I think that some peIceberg-4/9/1997
139 Gottfried. Re: >>>welcome pack' for newbies<<< Looks goHerb Fuller-4/9/1997
138 Herb, how about a 'welcome pack' for newbies - in the form of data, IOMGottfried-4/9/1997
137 Herb, I noticed the razor analogy in the report. I also think K.E's sectionGottfried-4/9/1997
136 Gottfried, Re:>>> I try to use non-confrontational prose. <<<Herb Fuller-4/9/1997
135 Herb, when conversing with a potentially unstable person I try to use non-confrGottfried-4/8/1997
134 Ice, I use McAfee's antivirus program 'Webscan' to screen incoming Gottfried-4/8/1997
133 >This could be true but at the same time anyone reading the posts would be aIceberg-4/8/1997
132 Ice , Re:>> many people find that infinitely more disturbing than simply Herb Fuller-4/8/1997
131 >we should respond in a positive way and using facts instead of telling themIceberg-4/8/1997
130 >That's scary. That is definitely a type III situation Stan, ExactlIceberg-4/8/1997
129 Ice, Re: Conversing with a type two post. I was posting factual numbers to oneHerb Fuller-4/8/1997
128 Linda, I think the name says it all, blabla. Definitely type I. Stan . . . .Stan Walker-4/8/1997
127 That's scary. That is definitely a type III situation. Not Dan (the indivStan Walker-4/8/1997
126 Ice, I think we are on the same page. I made my comments to Gottfried before IStan Walker-4/8/1997
125 Gottfried, every thread I've read doesn't have a poster like this but mStan Walker-4/8/1997
124 **to all AOL users** ==> KOOK alert...please read this exchange2000.com SoIceberg-4/8/1997
123 GM, someone mentioned this entity on the other thread (blabla). This person is Linda Pearson-4/8/1997
122 all, tired of investing? Check techstocks.com Note the day the thread started.Gottfried-4/8/1997
121 >check out 'twister', read his profile, look at his posts. How wouldIceberg-4/8/1997
120 Stan and Ice, here's a challenge: check out 'twister', read his proGottfried-4/7/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):