Muskox Minerals - MSK on Alberta. | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
Muskox Minerals - MSK on Alberta.

An SI Board Since November 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
294	10	0

Emcee: John E.Quinn	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
144	I think the connection to the English PP may be the good Dr. Morten. There wer	Elizabeth Andrews	-	12/20/2000
143	>>how does this every 6 month selling structure correspond to Maedels writ	Bruce Robbins	-	12/20/2000
142	Even if the drill holes work, and I think there is little chance of that after r	Elizabeth Andrews	-	12/20/2000
141	Bob, Bruce and SJ. I am glad to be out of half of it, but I am no wheres as pes	hank2010	-	12/19/2000
140	<<I can see this thing dragging on and on...>> It has to. The origin	s.jennings	-	12/19/2000
139	When the tech guys start using the geological mumbo jumbo for 3 news releases in	Bruce Robbins	-	12/19/2000
138	This is the latest NR from MSK. Pretty incredible. They are now almost playing w	Brumell	-	12/19/2000
137	I have been reviewing my Diamondfields information and have not found Morton'	Bruce Robbins	-	12/19/2000
136	From the Sept 2000 Maedel's report on MSK: "[Dr. Morten] is also known	Bruce Robbins	-	12/19/2000
135	And what did Dr. Morten do for Diamond Fields?	Elizabeth Andrews	-	12/19/2000
134	Dr Roger Morten.	Bruce Robbins	-	12/19/2000
133	Who in this promotion had anything to do with Diamond Fields?	Elizabeth Andrews	-	12/19/2000
132	Well you have been making $ the last few days. I guess there is not too much to	Bruce Robbins	-	12/18/2000
131	Why not? What is there to worry about?	Elizabeth Andrews	-	12/18/2000
130	Eliz, I think you will regret shorting this stock! PFG was a whole different gam	Gary Nash	-	12/18/2000
129	Are you suggesting that insiders are buying without disclosing the assays? Is th	Elizabeth Andrews	-	12/17/2000
128	Hi T.Bill, I wasn't referring to this thread as hysterical. As you say it&	Brumell	-	12/17/2000
127	Well, I reckon it is time to sell half and as you say see which way the tree fa	hank2010	-	12/17/2000
126	Hello Bob: I can't figure out where the statement "an increasingly hys	T.Bill	-	12/17/2000
125	Risky business Hank. They've been acting like two-bit hustlers since the Mae	Brumell	-	12/16/2000
124	That's why I shorted it. Assays shouldn't take a month should they? C$92	Elizabeth Andrews	-	12/16/2000
123	Hello Eliz, I like the potential of Muskox giant anomaly... but the stock is ve	Claude Cormier	-	12/16/2000
122	No, Jack, thanks for drawing this to my attention. I shorted some Muskox today a	Elizabeth Andrews	-	12/15/2000
121	Elizabeth: Thanks for drawing that to my attention. Confusing luck with brains	3bar	-	12/15/2000
120	Elizabeth you sure can spot the phony's.	3bar	-	12/15/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):