SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NETM: Whats the BEEF?
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2599 17 0 NETM
Emcee:  Steven S. Harris Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1449 Disagree. this co. is in deep trouble and may never turn around. Your best bet jim A-3/20/1997
1448 Netm is now moving to network software company rather than applications. They hYujin Maison-3/20/1997
1447 Franz; agree--NETM will survive and prosper long term, for reasons that I have Brander-3/19/1997
1446 Jim A. I'm curious as to what brokerage you went through to short this stoFranz Drinker-3/19/1997
1445 Jim, I had stops in place to take me out if NETM broke the old low which it didLarry J.-3/19/1997
1444 Jim, I bet my money on NETM that it would double its price in a near future ~6 Mike-3/19/1997
1443 techis bouncing back but not NETM. Beware, the 2s are near.jim A-3/19/1997
1442 Brad, the market is also efficient at evenetually disseminating info, and eventjim A-3/19/1997
1441 QB, I realize Jim has been shorting, or so he says, since $4.25; I was just poiBrander-3/19/1997
1440 Shorts haven't covered yet. This means there is more downside to come. The jim A-3/19/1997
1439 Brad, Jim has been shorting this stock since $4.25. I hope more short sellers Quick Bucks-3/19/1997
1438 Good for you! (now leave, please!)MLAHR-3/19/1997
1437 This company is on the path for a nice turn around. The more I hear and discovBrander-3/19/1997
1436 How are you overall on this stock? A big loss, I think. BradBrander-3/19/1997
1435 Possibly. I covered at 3.25 for a nice profit. Sorry more people didn't lisjim A-3/19/1997
1434 Are you sure it won't go any lower than 3?The Gambler-3/19/1997
1433 just a little more.jim A-3/19/1997
1432 It may hit 3 today. Thats whwn i'll cover.jim A-3/19/1997
1431 Larry, now that's a new low. This is still a good short.jim A-3/19/1997
1430 Not even todays new w/ MSFT can move this stock. The lows are yet to come. BEWAjim A-3/19/1997
1429 For what its worth: Just saw an ad in Newsweek for the US Robotics Palm pilot Dick Skalitzky-3/18/1997
1428 Jim, just to keep the record straight, 3.75 is not a new low. This distinctionLarry J.-3/18/1997
1427 Keep going. 3.75 - new low.jim A-3/18/1997
1426 read jims reply on both sides of the fence !!!!!! same same vcFRANK IRWIN CALOVICH-3/18/1997
1425 We will see, but I think that MSFT's and NETM's products are different Brander-3/17/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News