SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
biotech binary events
An SI Board Since March 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
295 36 0
Emcee:  dalroi Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
145As WE indicated recommending and upgrading OSIP target price, even IF NSCLC failMiljenko Zuanic-3/10/2004
144An upgrade shortly before a hugely important pivotal trial, arguing you'll bkeokalani'nui-3/10/2004
143>>10:01AM OSIP tgt raised to $43 at BofA Sec 38.02 +0.54: BofA Sec is raistuck-3/10/2004
142Not exactly a binary event, but quite a bit of news due from Vernalis in Q2 - &nigel bates-1/27/2004
141Chances for positive results (survival benefit and RR) are slim, imo. However, Miljenko Zuanic-11/3/2003
140OSIP has been weak since Tarceva followed in Iressa's footsteps by failing ituck-11/3/2003
139<i>GERN has a binary event coming up </i> Not funny for those who htom pope-10/29/2003
138Stefaan, December series optioons are now available for SEPR. Cheers, Tucktuck-10/28/2003
137CV Therapeutics' Ranexa: Odds For Approval Good' By Randall Osborne NatiIcebrg-10/25/2003
136FDA panel to look at CVTX' Ranexa Dec 9: Message 19428649 Cheers, Tucktuck-10/23/2003
135Also some upcoming PIIa announcements from VRTX, which just got its 2nd generatituck-10/22/2003
134Nigel, I know you and Peter have seen this, but felt it was worth cross postingtuck-10/19/2003
133From the NRGN thread: <I>...We believe Neurogen is the first of the clininigel bates-10/18/2003
132FDA will respond with non-approvable letter, at this time. More trials is must, Miljenko Zuanic-10/15/2003
131The health care hedge fund guys seem pretty certain the drug will not pass. MikMichael Young-10/15/2003
130CVTX volatility is rising, which is to be expected: ivolatility.comtom pope-10/15/2003
129It hasn't been officially deferred yet. It's getting so close to decisiorkrw-10/15/2003
128>>Will the fda decide or ask for more time? Deadline is closing in.<<keokalani'nui-10/15/2003
12710/30 PDUFA. What do you guys think? Will the fda decide or ask for more time? Drkrw-10/15/2003
126>>Isn't that the point ? In a large market, small (dis)/advantages canIcebrg-10/7/2003
125<i>current studies will just define how well it does</i> Isn't nigel bates-10/7/2003
124>>NPSP, March(?) '04>> I don't think that will be very binaIcebrg-10/7/2003
123NPSP, March(?) '04 Message 19379805 NPS announced that it has completed dosnigel bates-10/7/2003
122The reviewer's opinion may be characterized as relatively benign: <i>Icebrg-9/24/2003
121FDA Briefing materials:CEPH fda.govmichael_f_murphy-9/24/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):