SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
5spl
An SI Board Since April 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2534 28 0
Emcee:  LPS5 Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1459A couple of days late but... Sunday, June 6 2004, is International Capitalism DTimF-6/8/2004
1458So you think the way to make all Americans rich is to prohibit all imports? Uh,Lazarus_Long-6/7/2004
1457Wasn't the original government supported by tariffs only? Now that's a cSidney Reilly-6/5/2004
1456Wait til you get to the Municipal Contracts chapter. I like Section:244,part Dominick-6/4/2004
1455Once I got to the chapter entitled "Knee-Capping and Property Easement RehaBill Ulrich-6/4/2004
1454Related to the problem of letting Vespa-Papaleo have the rule-making power, is tBill Ulrich-6/4/2004
1453Appointed agency directors such as Vespa-Papaleo should be enforcing policy, notBill Ulrich-6/4/2004
1452You're right - there'd have to be a caveat for policing, given that to tLPS5-6/4/2004
1451If you include indirect effects then you can't have any government if you arTimF-6/4/2004
1450I loved that book. Especially the section on the strict adherence to the prepaDominick-6/4/2004
1449In terms of solutions addressing the socialist wasteland that this country is beLPS5-6/4/2004
1448The "Guide to Civics and Social/Municipal Practice" by John Gotti is aBill Ulrich-6/4/2004
1447I favor the old fashion Italian way of settling things. Beat the crap out of thaDominick-6/4/2004
1446Right, the case was argued (with lawyers) before a state agency director insteadBill Ulrich-6/4/2004
1445Apparently the NJ case was decided by J. Frank Vespa-Papaleo, the director of thTimF-6/4/2004
1444Hire better lawyers next time. That may sound facetious, but similar cases in otBill Ulrich-6/4/2004
1443<i> I would look at net effects in determining (anti)discrimination policTimF-6/4/2004
1442I would look at net effects in determining (anti)discrimination policy. The &quoBill Ulrich-6/4/2004
1441I agree, but assuming such laws are impossible to revoke or at least will take aTimF-6/4/2004
1440To me, there should be no such thing as <i>illegal</i> discriminatioLPS5-6/4/2004
1439Anyone have any thoughts about the conversation that started here - Message 201TimF-6/4/2004
1438Rulings in Illinois and Washington went the other way, though. Do we conclude thBill Ulrich-6/3/2004
1437The real reason for a lawsuit like that is the fact that attorneys fees are recomph-6/3/2004
1436<i>[He] complained about having to pay a $5 cover charge[...]</i> RLPS5-6/3/2004
1435<i>With a decreased probability of female population at this watering holeLPS5-6/3/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):