SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Centennial Technologies (CTN)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1959 7 0 CTN
Emcee:  sheldon zoldan Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1459 I am a believer in e-mail petition to Centennial for more information but not fFirehead-9/6/1997
1458 Does anyone know precisely what the requirements are for relisting? It's bDan-9/5/1997
1457 Maybe we should e-mail a petition to Centennial requesting they offer a conferePPearse-9/5/1997
1456 TO D.P.: I think most of the folks on this thread who were burned badly by the zalesky-9/4/1997
1455 Don; I appreciated your post. I don't know what (if any) influence this thPPearse-9/4/1997
1454 Stock Smart also gives quotes on CENL, just an FYI to all I,ve just finished redon page-9/4/1997
1453 Go to pcquote.com for a CENL quote. It'll be delayed 20 minutes. If you&#PPearse-9/3/1997
1452 How about CKKC, the next Boston Market. A small franchise fast-food that makesaatkinson-9/2/1997
1451 To Gary: Back in March, I was sent some paperwork concerning the lawsuit from zalesky-9/2/1997
1450 Class Action lawsuit acknowledgement I have called two of the many firms litigGary Leger-9/2/1997
1449 Frank, correction. TPRO now 7 1/4.fma-9/1/1997
1448 Frank, Check Si thread on TPRO. A Y2K company with a difference. They fix factofma-9/1/1997
1447 ALL.......While we are waiting for this scenario to unfold, I'm pondering, Frank childers-8/30/1997
1446 Hi, Thanks for the info and the stock tips. SUNW is of interest and it has hmargaret foley-8/28/1997
1445 To Margaret: As already stated you will receive compensation whether you sold yzalesky-8/28/1997
1444 To Margaret and others; I was hurt by the fraud too, having bought in at $31. PPearse-8/28/1997
1443 Thanks for your clarification,Paul. I had had a moment of Agita. Dilutive or noPaul Kelly-8/27/1997
1442 You don't have to sell. If you didn't sell, I suspect the price it reokolo55-8/27/1997
1441 Paul, your reply to Margaret implied that the loss had to be realized(i.e. you Paul Kelly-8/27/1997
1440 Paul, I agree with you completely. It is a disgrace that not only were theremargaret foley-8/27/1997
1439 No, it shouldn't work that way. You should get reimbursed based on how muckolo55-8/27/1997
1438 Are you saying that the shares I own, 200, will still be mine and that I will nmargaret foley-8/27/1997
1437 To Margaret: I'm expecting about 20% of the shares I previously had of Centzalesky-8/27/1997
1436 Do you think the stockholders have any hope of getting near a $50.oo value per margaret foley-8/27/1997
1435 To All: I spoke with Mr Devalario from the law firm Berrman, Devalario and Peaszalesky-8/26/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):