SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
TLCM
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
496 8 0 TLCM
Emcee:  anthony bui Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
146 Rob, I also felt the same way as your message implied. I had a couple of expeWei Chang-10/6/1997
145 It's funny how people think SB put out a sell on this stock. They downgradRon Wilhoit-10/6/1997
144 Can you say market manipulation. it is blatantly obvious that this stock is beRob L.-10/6/1997
143 Looking at a chart this price action seems perfectly logical, although not desiRon Wilhoit-10/6/1997
142 No bad news, but price is drifting down now so there may be something imminent.Biotechnic-10/6/1997
141 eddie, I just spoke with IR at TLCM. She had no comment regarding stock movemeRob L.-10/6/1997
140 Looks bad! breaking any support I thought it had if it breaks 12 I see 10 as sEddie D. Gilbert-10/6/1997
139 i am not quite sure what's going on. No news, low volume leads me to beleiRob L.-10/6/1997
138 Now it's dropped more than $1 on low volume!!! This is interesting. Any cKenneth Hung-10/6/1997
137 major support at 11. after that it looks like 8.5 or soRob L.-10/6/1997
136 I agree that its not looking to good, but why jump ship. this would be the wroRob L.-10/6/1997
135 It seems many agree with you. I get luckier and luckier each day for getting sAndrew Hunter-10/6/1997
134 I think it's time to jump ship!!!! this is not looking to good with earningEddie D. Gilbert-10/6/1997
133 Hey Anthony, I sent your Email (in your SI profile) but it bounced. Could you EFrank Povoski-10/3/1997
132 Ron, Thanks for the clarification. I was referring to Zack's own rating. John Abbott-10/3/1997
131 John, When I said Zacks, I meant their company report on analyst recommendatioRon Wilhoit-10/2/1997
130 Remember me? I'm the one who start this thread back in Mar. Well, guys and anthony bui-10/2/1997
129 Ron, I believe Zacks downgraded TLCM to a hold on 9-29-97. John AbbottJohn Abbott-10/2/1997
128 Ron, I like YOUR analysis! Maybe you should start covering this stock. You makeBiotechnic-10/2/1997
127 Well, down another 1/2 today. I wonder if H&Q and SB are accumulating sharRon Wilhoit-10/2/1997
126 Without SB commenting, it's hard to tell if we're comparing apples to oBiotechnic-10/2/1997
125 Remember that HQ's 6-month price target is 21. that's 6-months not 1 yRob L.-10/2/1997
124 >>They can't be both right<< They can be both right. HQ upgradeDennis C-10/2/1997
123 When there are two differing opinions on a promising stock, and one analyst offBiotechnic-10/2/1997
122 Biotechnic, This certainly is uncharacteristic movement for this stock. We arRob L.-10/2/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News