SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applix is back in action
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3014 28 0 APLX
Emcee:  Magnifique Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1464 I agree that APLX seems a likely takeover candidate, but I am uncertain as to tSoftSell-5/21/1997
1463 10Q? at sec.gov. More precisely, at: sec.gov DougDoug (Htfd,CT)-5/21/1997
1462 Deferred sales ? It is my understanding that some or all of the large transactG Edwards-5/21/1997
1461 Robert-I'm no CA and so would welcome someone else's opinion here but iGary Burton-5/21/1997
1460 Gary: most of the 10Q seemed to me to be a rehash of past statements. I did nRobert K. Schott-5/21/1997
1459 Gary: did you or any other T/A type here predict that one day point plus rise Robert K. Schott-5/21/1997
1458 Speaking of options....are theses traded options/warrants? If so, what's tIm-patient-5/21/1997
1457 Seems like the 3.25 exercise price is a bit alarming...or are they just trying Im-patient-5/21/1997
1456 I agree re volume and reversal. I was suspicious at 10 min mark after the open.Gary Burton-5/21/1997
1455 hello Gary: You couldn't ask for my bearish technical action in the stock.Joel Brussell-5/21/1997
1454 Notes that caught my eye from the 10Q just filed last week include the followinGary Burton-5/21/1997
1453 Steve: hanging in there. I haven't sold a single share, but I havent bougRobert K. Schott-5/21/1997
1452 Timir: actually, I was thinking more along the lines of ARSW buying APLX, or aRobert K. Schott-5/21/1997
1451 To all: the article that Stock Bull was thoughtful enough to bring to our atteRobert K. Schott-5/21/1997
1450 Hello Stephen: That's curious you got 7/16's cause I show it only tradJoel Brussell-5/20/1997
1449 You did not rain on my parade and what my point was that WHILE the bid was 1/8 Stephen M. DeMoss-5/20/1997
1448 While we are by no means out of the woods yet, today's trading was a positiGary Burton-5/20/1997
1447 hello stephen: I hate to rain on the parade, but the fact the Market makers moJoel Brussell-5/20/1997
1446 This note is for you but also Gary and technical guys. I put in a sell of callsStephen M. DeMoss-5/20/1997
1445 Robert, How you doing? Hang in there. On this sub-contracting deal announced yeStephen M. DeMoss-5/20/1997
1444 Robert, How would this eliminate a rival? Do you mean Applix could possibly tTimir-5/20/1997
1443 Robert, Here's the item I saw: WESTBORO, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 19, 1A. Reader-5/20/1997
1442 Robert: thank you so much for taking the time to print this. it is very much Robert K. Schott-5/20/1997
1441 I didn't need a password, but here is most of it: (By the way, I just boughRobert Lewis-5/20/1997
1440 Stock: apparently one needs a password to access this link. could you please Robert K. Schott-5/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):