SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Micro Fine Gold --USPS
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
872 24 0
Emcee:  C L Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
147 I'm in complete agreement with you on this, Chuckie. My CPA also concurs. C L-2/28/1997
146 Interpolate the $2,000 with the tonage, divide, get OPT; the BD report of last Chuca Marsh-2/28/1997
145 General Question to All: Is there a relationship between gold prices and the UAlex Burns-2/28/1997
144 Chuckie, Say what????????????????????????????? C LC L-2/28/1997
143 I wonder if anyone has asked what kind of equipment they now have on site. Do Lee Bush-2/28/1997
142 George, Good idea to not get carried away with numbers -- did you call Mel and C L-2/28/1997
141 Geoge, I understand what you are saying, and truly want your IMO, yet the <&Chuca Marsh-2/28/1997
140 Dan, Welcome to the desert dirts. This is a typical reaction from people that aC L-2/28/1997
139 George, you've got a deal. I only hope that you're heavy enough to holdRichard Mazzarella-2/28/1997
138 Richard, I have no problem with discussing possible estimates of ore grade butGeorge Alazar-2/28/1997
137 George, this is a $0.17 stock today, exactly where the DD state of the market iRichard Mazzarella-2/28/1997
136 Mike, I'm simply reading from the James M sheet which states "1 Ton 20George Alazar-2/28/1997
135 Richard my decimile points get crossed but sometimes I do key into a point or Chuca Marsh-2/28/1997
134 Mark, your TA tea reading was very impressive for USPS. What does your crystal Richard Mazzarella-2/28/1997
133 << 1 ton of ore smelted down to a 4lb concentrate which yielded $46KipferlMeister-2/28/1997
132 Robert, you make a very good point. It would have been nice to have a strong baRichard Mazzarella-2/28/1997
131 CL I've been "lurking" for awhile now and commend you and everyoDan Martin-2/28/1997
130 Hell, if this sector keeps rolling like it has lately -- I'll be able to paC L-2/27/1997
129 It appears to me they're handling what debt they have in a "can't Robert Scott-2/27/1997
128 CL, thanks, that is right in line with what GPGI is reporting. Maybe they can eRichard Mazzarella-2/27/1997
127 The correct valuation is $2000/Ton, according to Mel per his chemist. He told C L-2/27/1997
126 Robert, thank for all your typing effort. Sounds like they haven't paid anyRichard Mazzarella-2/27/1997
125 I greatly appreciate yours and George's explanations. Let me share with yoRobert Scott-2/27/1997
124 Richard, I agree $2000 makes a big difference but having been through the yearGeorge Alazar-2/27/1997
123 George, there's a big difference between $465/ton_ore and $2000 profit/ton_Richard Mazzarella-2/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News