SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Tekelec
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1648 32 0 TKLC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1473 I threw my arms up a week ago in an attempt to salvage gains from other companiAndre Daedone-4/14/2000
1472 Anybody whistling past the cemetary right now? (eom)John Curtis-4/13/2000
1471 I sold 75% of the shares @31 1/2 that I bought last week for 43 the very next dAndre Daedone-4/11/2000
1470 I hear ya.lml-4/10/2000
1469 Let's seeee, last Thursday it briefly breaks above $49, now here the followJohn Curtis-4/10/2000
1468 lml & WTSherman: Thanks for the cogent talk on the August calls. Bottom lJohn Curtis-4/9/2000
1467 WT: Just clicked on this morning. Thanks for your comments. I, too, think thlml-4/9/2000
1466 lml, humm... all very good questions and its difficult to get a clear picture.WTSherman-4/9/2000
1465 Hi WT: Your raise some very interesting questions, & I am eager to learn mlml-4/8/2000
1464 John, sorry I wasn't trying to be terribly mysterious... What I meant was WTSherman-4/8/2000
1463 WTSherman, et.al.: Thanks for pointing out the option "stuff". I haJohn Curtis-4/8/2000
1462 Has anyone else noticed the very large options positions in TKLC that are open WTSherman-4/8/2000
1461 Wooo hoooo, I smell a surge!! Yah gotta love those ~20 point swings in less thJohn Curtis-4/7/2000
1460 LWL: "That moron..." Yah...funny how this cyber-world is working thJohn Curtis-4/5/2000
1459 John: Yeah, hard to believe, but he just didn't like the fact that his invlml-4/5/2000
1458 LWL: He sold CSCO for that aforementioned loss, eh? Hmmmm....well, that happenJohn Curtis-4/5/2000
1457 Hi BWAC: Just passing thru, too. Its a more pleasant experience than yesterdalml-4/5/2000
1456 lml, Just passing time there. Again, I know exactly what you are saying. You aBWAC-4/5/2000
1455 BWAC: <i>I sure we don't want to go here</i> Then why do? Holml-4/5/2000
1454 LWL: You're right, we could talk about this forever(hopefully all the whilJohn Curtis-4/5/2000
1453 I sure we don't want to go here: But could CSCO ever earn enough to reallyBWAC-4/5/2000
1452 I wholeheartedly agree, John. My earlier comments were not directed to the yetlml-4/5/2000
1451 While I tend to agree still, when you place these days market realities againstJohn Curtis-4/5/2000
1450 <i>Placing high PEs on huge companies such as CSCO or MSFT is absurd . . lml-4/5/2000
1449 Good question. I'm wondering the same thing. Slick logo? Expensive licensinScrumpy-4/5/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):