SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Ultra OTC Fund - UOPIX
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2063 27 0 UOPIX
Emcee:  OldAIMGuy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1488Mang I think Tom answered your question, but to be a bit more specific, you canbob wallace-5/3/2001
1487Hi MC, Please approach UOPIX with your eyes open. It's a two edged sword. OldAIMGuy-5/3/2001
1486Bob, thanks for the explanation. Are there any restrictions on the timing of bMang Cheng-5/3/2001
1485Hi well, sounds like you ae scaling! and this has been the prefect weather for bob wallace-5/3/2001
1484Hi John, in a very non-AIM move, I added 67% to the UOPIX holding for our alumniOldAIMGuy-5/2/2001
1483Hi UOPIX is a mutual fund, and therefore there is no volume... you can trade ibob wallace-5/2/2001
1482Hi, I am new to this thread. Just a question: can I buy uopix in terms of 100 sMang Cheng-5/2/2001
1481Hi Bob, Don't look now, but the NDX action today has pushed UOPIX (at leastJohn-5/2/2001
1480John Todd hit the nail on the head - UOPIX is simply not related to QQQ, periodbob wallace-5/1/2001
1479Hi John, The better comparison is Nasdaq 100 (^NDX on yahoo) to UOPIX, as that Todd Reichardt-5/1/2001
1478All, Why is it that UOPIX doesn't really keep up with it's goal of moviJPM-5/1/2001
1477Eureka? The price action of UOPIX and USPIX over any period longer than a day cTodd Reichardt-4/28/2001
1476Hi Tom; lol.... After I thought about it I realized it couldn't have been budweeder-4/24/2001
1475Bernie; Your Right and I never looked at her from that angle, you sure gave me sJames F. Hopkins-4/24/2001
1474Hi Bud, That was my evil twin brother. He spends all his time with Technical AnaOldAIMGuy-4/23/2001
1473Hi Bud, Just back from vacation and catching up on the pile of posts here. ThankOldAIMGuy-4/23/2001
1472Hi Todd, 'Twas a mission of mercy to go to the Library while on vacation! AcOldAIMGuy-4/23/2001
1471I think you need to rework some of your figures. $10,000 invested in the Nasdaq Bernie Goldberg-4/23/2001
1470Jim; there was a 4 for 1 split July 19 of 99.. add that to the $3.54 cash divideJames F. Hopkins-4/22/2001
1469yes, well, that's the game planbob wallace-4/20/2001
1468Hi Bob, "volatility capture" is again probably a bad term, basically Todd Reichardt-4/20/2001
1467"volatility capture"? could you give an example? I have been readingbob wallace-4/20/2001
1466Barry, You're scaring me talking about a one day 50% decline in NDX. I gueTodd Reichardt-4/20/2001
1465Thanks Bernie....Bob Norman responded to me as well....I didn't realize it wbudweeder-4/20/2001
1464Hi Bob, "recover" was a bad word choice, I really meant more along thTodd Reichardt-4/20/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News