SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applix is back in action
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3014 28 0 APLX
Emcee:  Magnifique Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1489 Wasn't too happy to see this over on the Corel thread but it can't be bA. Reader-5/29/1997
1488 Gary, Thanks for the analysis. What does it mean that the downtrend line will bStephen M. DeMoss-5/28/1997
1487 The print of 4.25 this afternoon turned me back to neutral. A print of 4.00 wGary Burton-5/28/1997
1486 Hi Stephen, I found the news release on Business Wire at AOL and couldn't A. Reader-5/28/1997
1485 Thanks for posting this. It at least shows we remain in business. Will it help Stephen M. DeMoss-5/28/1997
1484 Java salvation? Some very interesting observations and proposals therein: Wilcarl griffith-5/28/1997
1483 Kurt: thanks Kurt. your post is most appreciated and most welcome. this is mRobert K. Schott-5/28/1997
1482 Department of Defense Contract WESTBORO, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 27, 1997-A. Reader-5/27/1997
1481 hello Stephen: Gary has laid out a wonderfully detailed analysis of the stock Joel Brussell-5/26/1997
1480 First hurdle is to crack the downtrend line on say Tues -next hurdle is 5.38-50Gary Burton-5/25/1997
1479 Gary, Thanks for the input. Barring ANY news, how high do you feel technically Stephen M. DeMoss-5/24/1997
1478 Steve--you may recall a few weeks ago I posted that I thought that the move up Gary Burton-5/24/1997
1477 Dear Gary, What are your thoughts on today's action? The stock was trading Stephen M. DeMoss-5/24/1997
1476 Hey Robert, I do not own any qdek. I still follow it as a possible indicator ofStephen M. DeMoss-5/23/1997
1475 Steve: I agree, and I'll try to get through to the CFO. there isn't mRobert K. Schott-5/23/1997
1474 Hey Joel, For you to say that is a positive<G>. You have not liked the teStephen M. DeMoss-5/23/1997
1473 Notice that the last few days have traced out a series of rising bottoms from tGary Burton-5/23/1997
1472 hello Stephen: I have a strange feeling we're on the verge of a serious moJoel Brussell-5/23/1997
1471 I meant more that the option was trading at the new ask but mostly was asking wStephen M. DeMoss-5/23/1997
1470 Stephen, how can you call the action on the July 5 calls decent volume? I get j g cordes-5/22/1997
1469 ..I assume folks have seen this at Sun's Java site: java.sun.com:80/nav/usJames Davis-5/22/1997
1468 Dear Joel, Thanks for your note! I agree with the trading of the stock today. GStephen M. DeMoss-5/22/1997
1467 Hello Stephen: We are on the launch pad, today's action was quite promisinJoel Brussell-5/22/1997
1466 To all really: Has anyone tried calling the company recently? Will someone? I cStephen M. DeMoss-5/22/1997
1465 Acquisition ... My money is still on, as I expressed months ago, Microsoft or carl griffith-5/22/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):