SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
3DFX
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
16960 43 0 TDFX
Emcee:  fiberman Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
14910 <I>I am vindicated.</I> IMHO, not a single person involved in thisGreg S.-9/21/1999
14909 Well Ben, you only included part of what Carmack said. Here's the full quotYeagher-9/21/1999
14908 Every developer agrees that T&L is more important than fillrate in the longYeagher-9/21/1999
14907 TDFX to make a statement about the Voodoo4 delay. avault.com 3dfx to Address Scott Garee-9/21/1999
14906 <i>when I posted my opinion that T&L was more important than fillrateBen Wu-9/21/1999
14905 T&L is important <b>right now</b> for these developers because Scott Garee-9/21/1999
14904 I am vindicated. Remember early last month when I posted my opinion that T&Yeagher-9/21/1999
14903 YATI (Yet Another TDFX Interview) combatsim.com This one on CombatSim. ItScott Garee-9/21/1999
14902 VE also has an item about an Invidia interview conducted by Fullon3D with severScott Garee-9/21/1999
14901 Hardware displacement mapping? A pretty interesting article started by Billy WScott Garee-9/21/1999
14900 <i>Being a new technology, I'm really not all that familiar with the Ben Wu-9/21/1999
14899 <i>I was thinking that if Napalm gets any later they would just cancel itBen Wu-9/21/1999
14898 Boy getting a little "aggressive" aren't we =). Let's do a brBen Wu-9/21/1999
14897 Good thing we all played 3Dfx for our investment in electronic entertainment. Jeff Lins-9/20/1999
14896 aggressive: you said: <i>Regardless of which party in the company [3dfx]Simon Cardinale-9/20/1999
14895 <i>That the troubled/delayed NAPALM project might now be recast and releaPlaz-9/20/1999
14894 <i>no one has given a response from a techy standpoint to my post</i&gPlaz-9/20/1999
14893 I owe you guys a little piece of info that came my way... But first, THANKS toJim Brannon-9/20/1999
14892 <i>I believe the industry will virtually disappear</i> Actually I tJoe C.-9/20/1999
14891 You just quoted an NVIDIA press release. Are you an experienced investor at alMichael G. Potter-9/20/1999
14890 <I>The v4's maximum performance is always less than 1G because it shaGreg S.-9/20/1999
14889 A little off-topic but: Diamond had to admit this afternoon that they don'Obewon-9/20/1999
14888 This is from quicken.com. "NVIDIA's New GeForce 256 Embraced by Industaggressive-9/20/1999
14887 If Napalm makes the 4th quarter that would be very good news. But that doesnYeagher-9/20/1999
14886 Initial reports say damage in the fabs is relatively light, although it is stilSynapsid-9/20/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):