SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3143 54 0
Emcee:  CountofMoneyCristo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1493<i>reading some of these posts is good for a laugh. </i> I'm eCountofMoneyCristo-7/10/2003
1492Jon, Did you used to post on the TLTK thread here at SI way back in the mid 90&Jane4IceCream-7/10/2003
1491Jon, That's why I quit posting. Challenge him with questions and he resortsDave O.-7/9/2003
1490<i>WOW. Absolutely astonishing and amazing what you were able to discern oCountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1489<i>You seem to have quite an insight into these matters. You post specificTheStockStalker-7/9/2003
1488Frivolous lawsuit, lol. I don't file frivolous lawsuits. If the defendantsCountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1487<i>Threaten anybody who disagrees with you or asks questions with legal acCountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
14861099's reporting trades DO NOT REPORT INCOME. Let me try that one more timeJon Tara-7/9/2003
1485LOL! "You seem to have quite an insight into these matters. You post speciJon Tara-7/9/2003
1484Why do you need to seek discovery of my identity? I use my real name here. I haJon Tara-7/9/2003
1483<i>You always seem to come up short on detail. </i> You must be jokCountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1482Since it is public record, why don't you save me the trouble. You always seJon Tara-7/9/2003
1481Thank-you for the tone of that last post. It's more conducive to a moderateCountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1480<Within one month, 1099's claiming my income for 1998-99 to be $125 millirogerover-7/9/2003
1479There are some things I can't discuss here at SI but his posts, well, their CountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1478<Longtime readers of this thread can recognize someone with an agenda when throgerover-7/9/2003
1477What is suspicious and revealing is that almost every post he has made here has CountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1476"<i>...especially when you do not address facts.</i>" Thewlcnyc-7/9/2003
1475Oh, OK, he made a general assumption. I don't think so. You are free to CountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1474<i>You seem to have quite an insight into these matters. You post specificwlcnyc-7/9/2003
1473<i>Count, can you explain in what way the 1099 was false?</i> If yoCountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1472When this case goes to trial I intend to seek discovery of your identity, and thCountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1471<i>A 1099 for trade proceeds can't be directly responsible for a tax lCountofMoneyCristo-7/9/2003
1470Count, can you explain in what way the 1099 was false? "They have committeJon Tara-7/9/2003
1469Did I say I was referring to you, Count?Jon Tara-7/9/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News