SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silicon Valley Group
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2946 26 0 SVGI
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1496 <The question arises, why did analysts ignore the reduced backlog and left tLLCF-3/11/1998
1495 All: Katherine Derbyshire (who authored the DPI/UT/ISI article) is on General LVolsi Mimir-3/11/1998
1494 RE:I have no faith in the analysts looking at SVG. Yes, I don't pay attentFJB-3/11/1998
1493 "Fixing" positions in portfolio -- use options ie. hold onto stock aabcde_98-3/11/1998
1492 Excellent post Yakov. Thanks for sharing your clear thoughts. I've held tFJB-3/11/1998
1491 I think it had more to do with the license buyout from IBM....SemiBullSemiBull-3/11/1998
1490 LB's comments on Yesterday's announcement... * This morning Silicon VaIan@SI-3/11/1998
1489 Yakov, I don't remember seeing any reduced backlog numbers coming out Ian@SI-3/11/1998
1488 [Re: managing analysts expectations] A 25% shortfall in earnings (roughly, $3Yakov Lurye-3/11/1998
1487 SVGI probably will do better than asmlf if there is another correction...so I tWilliam Nelson-3/10/1998
1486 My mistake... it was the settlement of royalty obligations with IBM in the quarJuniper-3/10/1998
1485 Juniper, Tinsley was acquired for about 1.1M shares if I remember correctlyIan@SI-3/10/1998
1484 <i> ...asmlf has lower p/e anyway </i> In all fairness, the actual Juniper-3/10/1998
1483 <.asmlf has lower p/e anyway,> With that "P" I don't thinkLLCF-3/10/1998
1482 < but the lame excuse they'd used combined with continued claims about eLLCF-3/10/1998
1481 Hold on for now - the book value is $18.06 and co has ~ $190million in cash. Iabcde_98-3/10/1998
1480 IMO, this news release is a big snafoo on the part of Mr. T. Personally, I woulYakov Lurye-3/10/1998
1479 The downward trend in Asia takes pressure off of U.S. and other companies to exRob S.-3/10/1998
1478 I'm thinking now there's nothing svgi can do for us that cymi and asmlfWilliam Nelson-3/10/1998
1477 I agree something is amiss. Reports from SPIE attendees were that SVGI could seTI2, TechInvestorToo-3/10/1998
1476 Bob, Their customers have been INTC, MOT, TXN and IBM. Only IBM hasn'Ian@SI-3/10/1998
1475 Intel's '98 cap. ex. is still on plan according to their release from lFJB-3/10/1998
1474 Ian, Seems very fishy. I don't care for current management. I'll nevFJB-3/10/1998
1473 It's a slowdown likely from INTC -- see yahoo message boardabcde_98-3/10/1998
1472 Juniper and William, I'd have to agree. If companies were lining up tIan@SI-3/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News