SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. (Bulls Board)

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. (Bulls Board)

An SI Board Since July 2006

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1521	44	0	SLJB

Emcee: jmhollen	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1496	How can we confirm that SLJB is indeed participating in this show? (It may expla	xcentral1	-	1/31/2007
1495	Agreed ~	xcentral1	-	1/28/2007
1494	Nice to see a little fresh content on the sulja boys website, I think while ther	lesurazz	-	1/28/2007
1493	New product flyer posts on the website: suljabros.com suljabros.com suljabros	xcentral1	-	1/22/2007
1492	There is no good answer to your question, due to continuing lack of verifiable c	Clyde Stone	-	1/11/2007
1491	Is this a good stock?	Petatv	-	1/10/2007
1490	The affidavit finally defined the ""short seller capture program"	atm_prophet	-	1/10/2007
1489	The Good - the Bad and the Ugly.... So I guess the good news is that the OSC di	xcentral1	-	1/10/2007
1488	SLJB Announces Internal Review of Prior Public Disclosure and Other Matters; Als	xcentral1	-	1/10/2007
1487	Ted, Ya think Petar will get jail time or just a fine? What about Steve Sulja	Petatv	-	1/7/2007
1486	"Between August 2006 and November 2006, these accounts received large amoun	atm_prophet	-	1/5/2007
1485	Stop this crap. With almost every post rrufff said this was a crap shoot,but th	manny t	-	1/5/2007
1484	<i>Quite simply, no money is lost by an investor till the share is sold.&l	creede	-	1/4/2007
1483	pnv said... FALSE again: Companys with a 25 yr track record dont need to go pub	lesurazz	-	1/3/2007
1482	I guess it's wait-n-see, I'm glad to see it holding @.013 at this point.	lesurazz	-	1/3/2007
1481	Man... imo, not much. I guess an argument could be made that just because Petar	creede	-	1/1/2007
1480	jmhollen, will you please update this FALSEHOOD in the header-box? <i>SLJ	bones142O	-	12/31/2006
1479	lewmonade, I have noticed those behind the Sarbanes-Oxley Act also appear to hav	bones142O	-	12/31/2006
1478	Fine by me. Happy New Year.	Jim Bishop	-	12/31/2006
1477	Posts like the one I am responding to from saviors (bashers) such as you and you	holein13x	-	12/30/2006
1476	any pro-sentiment left? Or did I (we all?) get F'd by a bunch of woodpeckers	lesurazz	-	12/30/2006
1475	lew, perhaps I had you mixed up with someone else. I spent some time myself qu	creede	-	12/29/2006
1474	Creede ... I have not touted the company, you're jumping to conclusions. If	lewmonade	-	12/29/2006
1473	The heat is starting on Petar, Steve and Gang .... Some of us won't take wh	atm_prophet	-	12/29/2006
1472	Lewmonade, if attack the messenger, and refuse to acknowledge the most damning	creede	-	12/29/2006

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):