SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Netcom
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2601 5 0 NETC
Emcee:  Colin Perry Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1501 The implant theory has really got the thread buzzing. I wish I could say that Michael Kim-6/18/1997
1500 hmm, the thought crossed my mind as well. on the other hand, though i cant quiball peen-6/18/1997
1499 Rich you are one wise dude. Your comment about Yost being a plant has crossed Findit-6/18/1997
1498 <<<Netcom On-Line Communication Services Inc said it has appointed DanRichard Makowiec-6/18/1997
1497 Excellent point Raana. I guess I just didn't look at the spread, only the Michael Kim-6/18/1997
1496 Actualy todays trading troubled me, last hour it went down to 16 1/8 and then raana mir-6/18/1997
1495 Paul Wick, the manager of the $3 Billion Seligman Communications fund limits hiDeep Six-6/17/1997
1494 Rock steady today. 610,000 shares churned and we only lost 1/4? Man, must be Michael Kim-6/17/1997
1493 Just a quick sidebar... I have been reading ELNK thread...interesting how the CCurtis Gruber-6/17/1997
1492 Link from yesterday: biz.yahoo.com from today biz.yahoo.com also: <<<Curtis Gruber-6/17/1997
1491 lol rich..CA, huh? so I get to have my own acronym now..... funny, made me laugCurtis Gruber-6/17/1997
1490 Right on about the spread Rich. I seem to recall a time when the spread was 3/Michael Kim-6/16/1997
1489 Curtis...MK...good investors you are (and the thread as well). It is delightfulRichard Makowiec-6/16/1997
1488 Funny, everytime I log into SI, I'm greeted with Colin's original messaMichael Kim-6/16/1997
1487 thanks for the link rich....news to us...I wonder if it is news for the rest ofCurtis Gruber-6/16/1997
1486 News: biz.yahoo.com Have a nice evening all, RichRichard Makowiec-6/16/1997
1485 Does Zack's actually make their own buy/sell recommendations? For some reaMichael Kim-6/16/1997
1484 I probably should not post that data because I am a subsciber to Zack's serCraig Rogers-6/16/1997
1483 Whoops! Just checked back with Zacks, there are actually 2 brokers with a modeMichael Kim-6/16/1997
1482 welcome to the thread craig and phillip....eom. cgCurtis Gruber-6/16/1997
1481 Good news!! With so many tech companies worth buying, but only enough $$ to invDeep Six-6/15/1997
1480 Craig thanks for that breakdown...tell me where u got the info. please...is it Curtis Gruber-6/15/1997
1479 Zacks still shows consensus rating of 2.1, same as Curtis' post #1319 on 5/Michael Kim-6/15/1997
1478 Great news Craig. Do you know when this news was made public? Was it on 6/10,Michael Kim-6/15/1997
1477 NeTc was upgraded this week by Zacks. To a strong buy! ETC: ABN/CHICAGO COR inCraig Rogers-6/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News