SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
A Neutral Corner
An SI Board Since September 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2253 11 0
Emcee:  Constant Reader Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1503<i> Well, if that was an attempt to protect them, they did a pretty shabbyTimF-11/7/2005
1502<i>it would seem to imply that the conservative judicial movement calls foLane3-11/7/2005
1501<i> A hallmark of that tradition is the belief in "natural law,"TimF-11/7/2005
1500<i> The holdings of courts of law have as much force of law as acts of theTimF-11/7/2005
1499<i>My point is that they didn't think of it as thin gruel at all.</Lane3-11/7/2005
1498<i> but simply announcing that there are other natural rights out there isTimF-11/7/2005
1497"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be constTimF-11/7/2005
1496I think you said you like George Rodrigue -- if so, he's got a silkscreen saIlaine-11/7/2005
1495Here's another piece that addresses the tradition in reason of Catholicism. Lane3-11/7/2005
1494I have a few Quaker lines as well, but as yet, am not well versed with them. KnKLP-11/6/2005
1493I was not confused about your position. I just had to put in my two cents. <ManyMoose-11/6/2005
1492<i>The same goes for the other natural rights</i> I don't want D. Long-11/6/2005
1491I prefer the bumper sticker that says "You can have my gun when you pry it ManyMoose-11/6/2005
1490Good one!Lane3-11/6/2005
1489<i>I hope you're enjoying contemplating those natural right figments tD. Long-11/6/2005
1488<i> No it isn't semantics. It is substantive point that the law is notD. Long-11/6/2005
1487The Quakers also started the George School outside of Philadelphia which was patSuma-11/6/2005
1486You are debating which is the better way to protect rights that one chooses not Lane3-11/6/2005
1485Am I coming too late to this discussion? I don't understand why there is anManyMoose-11/6/2005
1484 I don't think rights without formal methods to protect them are worthless.TimF-11/6/2005
1483CR and Peter, nlm.nih.gov "In very rare instances, healthy persons who haLady Lurksalot-11/5/2005
1482Many people along the path of life have served others. The Presbyterians and thKLP-11/5/2005
1481I'm not saying there are no natural rights. What I'm trying to say is thLane3-11/5/2005
1480Why was Katrina such a tragedy? In large part, because these people scare the beIlaine-11/5/2005
1479<i> . Was discussing just the other day on another thread that a right isnTimF-11/5/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):