SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
INNI-I/NET
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1856 9 0 INNI
Emcee:  majaman1978 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1506 My understanding of "offshore investing" (and it may not be accurate)Charles Hogue-3/25/1999
1505 No. We know already that the first quarter sales won't be significant due tYongzhi Yang-3/23/1999
1504 Yongzhi, did you talk to him about the Netscape porting software sales? TIA. EE.H.F.-3/23/1999
1503 Just talked to Mr. Markee. He was just talking to people in Cayman before andYongzhi Yang-3/23/1999
1502 Maybe everyone is buying AOL... I tried to post a little note (spam) on the YNoProtocol-3/22/1999
1501 For all you guys who thought Sam's post last week was the reason for the drMark Shute-3/22/1999
1500 yes, nice to get that nonsense out of the way. It did provide a buying opportunscott bradley-3/19/1999
1499 I take one day off, from perusing these boards and I miss a BUYING opportunity!John Wilson-3/19/1999
1498 Dear Mr. Markee: Today would be a great day to issue a big press release: ItMD Hunter-3/19/1999
1497 <<Anyone who wants to buy would post mis-information to drive the price Loren S.-3/18/1999
1496 Gary, true - no one person's post will affect a stock price. However, theThe_Ice_Man-3/18/1999
1495 Peter and Loren, if you are correct in that one person can affect the price of gary r. albrecht-3/18/1999
1494 Sorry, you are wrong Gary it was a statement and two questions, posted right afPeter M.-3/18/1999
1493 The rumor of insider selling was extremely easy to spot as false...all one had E.H.F.-3/18/1999
1492 Any thoughts on how the AOL/Netscape merger may effect the future value of the Raiders227-3/18/1999
1491 I cannot offer proof of my belief that Sam's post was responsible for todayLoren S.-3/18/1999
1490 from another board ... The_Ice_Man-3/18/1999
1489 Loren, look at the time of the posts, specifically yy's comment that there gary r. albrecht-3/18/1999
1488 <<To think that his question is responsible for today's decrease is sLoren S.-3/18/1999
1487 Thanks. I just asked. I am still a stockholder and want to see this go up. Sam Lee-3/18/1999
1486 We have discussed that 237,000 shares before. The person filed 144 is not with Yongzhi Yang-3/18/1999
1485 peter and dick, get a life! he made an error. To think that his question is regary r. albrecht-3/18/1999
1484 Sam Lee, don't know why you are doing this -- scaring everybody to death. EPeter M.-3/18/1999
1483 It appears that Mr. Lee doesn't know how to fully comprehend the informatiodick west-3/18/1999
1482 Good. This is an instance when I am glad to be wrong b/c I am a stockholder. Sam Lee-3/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News