SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
INCE - Intercell info???
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3358 14 0 INCE
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1508 James: My take was that IR was out of the loop entirely, but that seems hard toLee Bush-5/29/1997
1507 Lee, did you get any flavor in the tone of their voices or did they reveal anytJamey-5/29/1997
1506 Lee, I also called yesterday and was told that overall, everything is going actom rushing-5/29/1997
1505 Scott: That is nice to know. I called the IR people yesterday. The company waLee Bush-5/29/1997
1504 To All: My TA site shows an MACD buy signal triggered on 5/28. (eom) ScottScott H. Davis-5/29/1997
1503 Mike, I agree with you. IMO, this is one of the best investments around. JamesJamey-5/28/1997
1502 (James, this is not directed at you...you just happen t obe the last post-er...Mike-5/28/1997
1501 What is evident is that Terry and Lou are back from their business in AustraliaJamey-5/28/1997
1500 Bill, Well said. I can understand the anxiety of some. I have bought in high onJamey-5/27/1997
1499 Well said..... <<<I think INCE is really trying to be as accurate as Bill Pearson-5/27/1997
1498 James, I totally agree with you. We all need to take the information presenteJams-5/27/1997
1497 Sorry to all.. I was looking at WORTH that day.. never took the story home.. nJoseph F. Trombetta-5/27/1997
1496 James, My apologies, I didn't read that post where the date was changed. pz-5/27/1997
1495 I did not mean to sound harsh towards the messager. I simply was expressing doJames Unterburger-5/27/1997
1494 Paul, I suggest that you, along wuth James read all of my posts. If you do not Jamey-5/27/1997
1493 James, I want you to understand that I was told the 28th and I reported as suchJamey-5/27/1997
1492 James, You mean this quote from a post by James G? exchange2000.com <<pz-5/27/1997
1491 >>He said no, and I would understand why after reading the >>announJames Unterburger-5/27/1997
1490 Truman: It must bee the rite word. Spell-Check doesn't lye.(gg) I'll chick in NC-5/27/1997
1489 Truman - thank you for checking into the Worth article for the rest of us.Bill Pearson-5/27/1997
1488 Bill: Tantalized by Mr. Trombetta's muted reference to Worth Magazine, I wawooden ships-5/27/1997
1487 Joseph: Sure would be great if you could share a least the sibject of the artiBill Pearson-5/26/1997
1486 Scott, I would recommend that everyone read closely the May 15 10Q for the firsJamey-5/25/1997
1485 Can u give us a hint? (eom) ScottScott H. Davis-5/25/1997
1484 Brian & All Others Check out WORTH June 1997 Issue Page 72 Stock # 6 We aJoseph F. Trombetta-5/25/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News