SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oak Technology (OAKT)
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4335 22 0 OAKT
Emcee:  Clam Clam Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1510 Bill: In addition to volume leading price, sometimes negative indicators show Mark Steffler-9/19/1996
1509 Mark, you make a good point and the answer, of course, is to compete. Whether tbill tilghman-9/19/1996
1508 Thanks for the tech analysis. After I read your post last night, I lowered my FuzzFace-9/19/1996
1507 Does anyone know the reason for today's jump? I can't find any new newDrew Batshaw-9/19/1996
1506 Chart Analysis: This chart is butt-ugly. there is little underlying strength Mark Steffler-9/18/1996
1505 To Edwin Peters, We are not loser so far because we have another opportuniJames Yu-9/18/1996
1504 It appears that a triple bottom could be coming into play if the stock holds 6.Michael H. Dragon-9/18/1996
1503 I sure hope you meant that SUPPORT was very strong between $6 and $6 1/4 or we&FuzzFace-9/18/1996
1502 I must admit I am intrigued by the recent action. High volume and no movement ron villegas-9/17/1996
1501 To all, It is a very interesting tug of war between supply and demand. ReJames Yu-9/17/1996
1500 >>You bought this stock without any of this knowledge you now seek? You Eddie Kim-9/17/1996
1499 I don't know for sure. But, my guess is there is a lot of the stock layingSparky65-9/17/1996
1498 Calling all OAKT technical experts! What does a huge volume (relative to the 3FuzzFace-9/17/1996
1497 To Michael Sphar, You are right, and all three indexes (SOX, NASDQ, DOW) James Yu-9/16/1996
1496 By the way Marky, where are ou from?wiliam aged-9/16/1996
1495 Hi James, Dumped an acorn at 6.125 today. Seemed like it was going the wrong wMichael Sphar-9/16/1996
1494 Hi James, I did not say you were wrong, I said you had been "wronged&quoMichael Sphar-9/16/1996
1493 Have the same estimates in front of me. Does anyone has access to others that sTom Viergever-9/16/1996
1492 To Michael Sphar, Let us continue our last topic. From Luo's insiders James Yu-9/15/1996
1491 Usually these suits are settled out of court for substantial less than the amouMark The Trader-9/14/1996
1490 This is a reply to an old post of yours asking what % of the lawsuit would lawyMark The Trader-9/14/1996
1489 To Michael Sphar, If you read OAKT's last quarter balance sheet very carJames Yu-9/14/1996
1488 Actually Mark when they make a judgment the members of the class will get checkMark The Trader-9/14/1996
1487 You would have been mailed a form to fill out if you were a member of the classMark The Trader-9/14/1996
1486 Thanks for the info James, From following the commentary here over the past feMichael Sphar-9/14/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News