SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
152472 747 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Quincy Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
151047HF - cautious!!!Should be isn't always will be! Best, Llimtex-7/11/2007
151046Broadcom Offers to License ITC Patent Royalty-Free to Public Agencies and HealthRuffian-7/11/2007
151045"<I>In fact, judging by the number of recs certain posts are getting,rkral-7/11/2007
151044Lim: if as you say: "The stock should have been well over $60 a share in thedgefund-7/11/2007
151043<i>...trying to find a different remedy...</i> Oh no, not politicosjackmore-7/11/2007
151042Politicos want veto of cell phone import ban Posted by Anne Broache July 11, 20benhorseman-7/11/2007
151041<i> the constant complaining from limtex, or the constant complaining aboumanalagi-7/11/2007
151040Well said and I agree. In fact, judging by the number of recs certain posts are im a survivor-7/11/2007
151039Well said!!im a survivor-7/11/2007
151038From $32 to close to $50 is <b>measly</b> ? Even if you missed buyiim a survivor-7/11/2007
151037Weird but not unheard of. QCOM usualy has a fairly tight spread on bid/ask. Alim a survivor-7/11/2007
151036Judging from your age, you've been around the block more than I have Jim. Fgolfinvestor-7/11/2007
151035Well the last time I posted a negative comment about Limtex on the other board Ijimtracker1-7/11/2007
151034Lim, I agree with you QCOM is worth more than $44 a share, but it doesn't magolfinvestor-7/11/2007
151033<i>THEN, last 2 minutes, BID dropped to 43.80-43.81, ASK started out 43.91ggamer-7/11/2007
151032GI - GB and many others would have been OK (had higher portfolio values) had it limtex-7/11/2007
151031VERY strange action the last 10 minutes (the only time I really was watching) - planetsurf-7/11/2007
151030Breakevenitus is a tough investment road IMHO, especially with a stock like QCOMgolfinvestor-7/11/2007
151029I have no problem that you are frustrated. Nor would I have any problem with yoim a survivor-7/11/2007
151028Actually he could be either long, short, or hold no position at all. It really dgoingbroke-7/11/2007
151027It's a mirage. It isnt really green. That .90 UP move and the $44+ price is im a survivor-7/11/2007
151026I am having a hard time figuring out what is worse...the constant complaining frslacker711-7/11/2007
151025Well I know of one that I dont trust. Why he needs to lie about his short positiim a survivor-7/11/2007
151024As I type, QCOM is <b>UP</b> around .70 and pretty close to $44, andim a survivor-7/11/2007
151023gi - no one happier than me to see it provided it heads up from here and no downlimtex-7/11/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News